Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair With Suture Augmentation Is Biomechanically Equivalent to Reconstruction and Clinically Demonstrates Excellent Outcomes: A Systematic Review.
Spears, Thomas M; Parikh, Bhavya; Chalmers, Peter N; Smith, Matthew V; Freehill, Michael T; Bowman, Eric N.
Affiliation
  • Spears TM; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, U.S.A.
  • Parikh B; Zucker School of Medicine/Northwell at Northshore and Long Island Jewish, Manhasset, New York, U.S.A.
  • Chalmers PN; Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S.A.
  • Smith MV; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University, Chesterfield, Missouri, U.S.A.
  • Freehill MT; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, California, U.S.A.
  • Bowman EN; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, U.S.A.. Electronic address: Eric.N.Bowman@vumc.org.
Arthroscopy ; 40(4): 1343-1355.e1, 2024 Apr.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37832744
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To systematically review (1) biomechanical properties of augmented elbow ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) repair compared with reconstruction and (2) clinical efficacy and complication rates of UCL repair with and without augmentation.

METHODS:

A systematic review was completed August 15, 2023, identifying articles that (1) biomechanically compared suture augmented UCL repair and reconstruction and (2) clinically evaluated medial elbow UCL repairs. Search terms included "UCL repair" OR "internal brace" OR "suture augmentation" AND "UCL reconstruction." For inclusion, biomechanical studies compared augmented repair with reconstruction; clinical studies required clinical outcomes with minimum 6-month follow-up. Biomechanical data included torsional stiffness, gap formation, peak torque, and failure torque. Clinical data included return to previous level of play, time to return, functional outcomes, and complications.

RESULTS:

In total, 8 biomechanical and 9 clinical studies were included (5 with and 4 without augmentation). In most biomechanical studies, augmented repairs demonstrated less gap formation, with equivalent torsional stiffness, failure load, and peak torque compared with reconstruction. Clinical outcomes in 104 patients without augmentation demonstrated return to previous level of 50% to 94% for nonprofessional athletes and 29% for professional baseball pitchers. Suture augmented repairs in 554 patients demonstrated return to previous level from 92% to 96%, at 3.8 to 7.4 months, with Kerlan Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic scores of 86 to 95. The overall complication rate for augmented UCL repair was 8.7%; most commonly ulnar neuropraxia (6%).

CONCLUSIONS:

Biomechanically, UCL repair with augmentation provided less gapping with equivalent torsional stiffness and failure compared with reconstruction. Clinically, augmented UCL repair demonstrated excellent return to previous level of play and Kerlan Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic scores with modest complications and time to return. Augmented UCL repair is biomechanically equivalent to reconstruction and may be a viable alternative to reconstruction in indicated athletes. CLINICAL RELEVANCE UCL repair with suture augmentation is biomechanically equivalent to reconstruction and clinically demonstrates excellent outcomes.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Baseball / Collateral Ligaments / Elbow Joint / Collateral Ligament, Ulnar / Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Type of study: Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Arthroscopy Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Baseball / Collateral Ligaments / Elbow Joint / Collateral Ligament, Ulnar / Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Type of study: Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Arthroscopy Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos