Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of Phantom Size on Low-Energy Virtual Monoenergetic Images of Three Dual-Energy CT Platforms.
Greffier, Joël; Van Ngoc Ty, Claire; Fitton, Isabelle; Frandon, Julien; Beregi, Jean-Paul; Dabli, Djamel.
Affiliation
  • Greffier J; IMAGINE UR UM 103, Department of Medical Imaging, Nimes University Hospital, Montpellier University, 30029 Nimes, France.
  • Van Ngoc Ty C; Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université de Paris, 75015 Paris, France.
  • Fitton I; Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université de Paris, 75015 Paris, France.
  • Frandon J; IMAGINE UR UM 103, Department of Medical Imaging, Nimes University Hospital, Montpellier University, 30029 Nimes, France.
  • Beregi JP; IMAGINE UR UM 103, Department of Medical Imaging, Nimes University Hospital, Montpellier University, 30029 Nimes, France.
  • Dabli D; IMAGINE UR UM 103, Department of Medical Imaging, Nimes University Hospital, Montpellier University, 30029 Nimes, France.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 13(19)2023 Sep 25.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37835782
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to compare the quality of low-energy virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) obtained with three Dual-Energy CT (DECT) platforms according to the phantom diameter. Three sections of the Mercury Phantom 4.0 were scanned on two generations of split-filter CTs (SFCT-1st and SFCT-2nd) and on one Dual-source CT (DSCT). The noise power spectrum (NPS), task-based transfer function (TTF), and detectability index (d') were assessed on VMIs from 40 to 70 keV. The highest noise magnitude values were found with SFCT-1st and noise magnitude was higher with DSCT than with SFCT-2nd for 26 cm (10.2% ± 1.3%) and 31 cm (7.0% ± 2.5%), and the opposite for 36 cm (-4.2% ± 2.5%). The highest average NPS spatial frequencies and TTF values at 50% (f50) values were found with DSCT. For all energy levels, the f50 values were higher with SFCT-2nd than SFCT-1st for 26 cm (3.2% ± 0.4%) and the opposite for 31 cm (-6.9% ± 0.5%) and 36 cm (-5.6% ± 0.7%). The lowest d' values were found with SFCT-1st. For all energy levels, the d' values were lower with DSCT than with SFCT-2nd for 26 cm (-6.2% ± 0.7%), similar for 31 cm (-0.3% ± 1.9%) and higher for 36 cm (5.4% ± 2.7%). In conclusion, compared to SFCT-1st, SFCT-2nd exhibited a lower noise magnitude and higher detectability values. Compared with DSCT, SFCT-2nd had a lower noise magnitude and higher detectability for the 26 cm, but the opposite was true for the 36 cm.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Francia

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Francia