Artificial intelligence in osteoarthritis detection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: As an increasing number of studies apply artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms in osteoarthritis (OA) detection, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to pool the data on diagnostic performance metrics of AI, and to compare them with clinicians' performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search in PubMed and Scopus was performed to find studies published up to April 2022 that evaluated and/or validated an AI algorithm for the detection or classification of OA. We performed a meta-analysis to pool the data on the metrics of diagnostic performance. Subgroup analysis based on the involved joint and meta-regression based on multiple parameters were performed to find potential sources of heterogeneity. The risk of bias was assessed using Prediction Model Study Risk of Bias Assessment Tool reporting guidelines. RESULTS: Of the 61 studies included, 27 studies with 91 contingency tables provided sufficient data to enter the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivities for AI algorithms and clinicians on internal validation test sets were 88% (95% confidence interval [CI] 86,91) and 80% (95% CI 68,88) and pooled specificities were 81% (95% CI 75,85) and 79% (95% CI 80,85), respectively. At external validation, the pooled sensitivity and specificity for AI algorithms were 94% (95% CI 90,97) and 91% (95% CI 77,97), respectively. CONCLUSION: Although the results of this meta-analysis should be interpreted with caution due to the potential pitfalls in the included studies, the promising role of AI as a diagnostic adjunct to radiologists is indisputable.