Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Use of Wearable Devices in Oncology Patients: A Systematic Review.
Chow, Ronald; Drkulec, Hannah; Im, James H B; Tsai, Jane; Nafees, Abdulwadud; Kumar, Swetlana; Hou, Tristan; Fazelzad, Rouhi; Leighl, Natasha B; Krzyzanowska, Monika; Wong, Philip; Raman, Srinivas.
Affiliation
  • Chow R; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Drkulec H; Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Im JHB; Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Applied Sciences & Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Tsai J; Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Nafees A; The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Kumar S; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Hou T; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Fazelzad R; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Leighl NB; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Krzyzanowska M; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Wong P; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Raman S; Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Oncologist ; 29(4): e419-e430, 2024 Apr 04.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37971410
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the current literature on wearable technologies in oncology patients for the purpose of prognostication, treatment monitoring, and rehabilitation planning.

METHODS:

A search was conducted in Medline ALL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Emcare, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science, up until February 2022. Articles were included if they reported on consumer grade and/or non-commercial wearable devices in the setting of either prognostication, treatment monitoring or rehabilitation.

RESULTS:

We found 199 studies reporting on 18 513 patients suitable for inclusion. One hundred and eleven studies used wearable device data primarily for the purposes of rehabilitation, 68 for treatment monitoring, and 20 for prognostication. The most commonly-reported brands of wearable devices were ActiGraph (71 studies; 36%), Fitbit (37 studies; 19%), Garmin (13 studies; 7%), and ActivPAL (11 studies; 6%). Daily minutes of physical activity were measured in 121 studies (61%), and daily step counts were measured in 93 studies (47%). Adherence was reported in 86 studies, and ranged from 40% to 100%; of these, 63 (74%) reported adherence in excess of 80%.

CONCLUSION:

Wearable devices may provide valuable data for the purposes of treatment monitoring, prognostication, and rehabilitation. Future studies should investigate live-time monitoring of collected data, which may facilitate directed interventions.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Wearable Electronic Devices / Neoplasms Type of study: Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Oncologist Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canadá

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Wearable Electronic Devices / Neoplasms Type of study: Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Oncologist Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canadá