Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of the PFAS and physical-chemical parameter fluctuations between an ash landfill and a MSW landfill.
Zhang, Hekai; Chen, Yutao; Liu, Yalan; Bowden, John A; Townsend, Timothy G; Solo-Gabriele, Helena M.
Affiliation
  • Zhang H; Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33146, United States.
  • Chen Y; Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33146, United States.
  • Liu Y; Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatics Engineering, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, 33431, United States.
  • Bowden JA; Department of Environmental Engineering Sciences, College of Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, United States; Center for Environmental and Human Toxicology & Department of Physiological Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 3261
  • Townsend TG; Department of Environmental Engineering Sciences, College of Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, United States.
  • Solo-Gabriele HM; Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33146, United States. Electronic address: hmsolo@miami.edu.
Waste Manag ; 174: 558-567, 2024 Feb 15.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38141373
ABSTRACT
Studies of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) fluctuations at landfills have focused on municipal solid waste (MSW) leachate. Few studies exist that evaluate fluctuations (defined by the coefficient of variation, CV) in MSW incinerator ash (MSWA) landfill leachate and that evaluate PFAS fluctuations in stormwater, groundwater, and treated liquids on-site. In this study, aqueous landfill samples (leachate, treated leachate, stormwater, gas condensate, ambient groundwater, and effluent from a groundwater remediation system) were collected from a MSW and an MSWA landfill geographically located within close proximity (less than 40 km). The objective of this study was to compare the leachate compositions between these two landfill types and to evaluate temporal variations. Results indicated that the CV of total detected PFAS concentrations in leachate was higher for the MSW landfill (CV = 43 %) compared to the MSWA landfill (CV = 16 %). The total detected PFAS concentration in MSW leachate samples (mean 9641 ng/L) was higher than in MSWA leachate samples (mean 2621 ng/L) (p < 0.05). Within a landfill, PFAS concentrations were correlated (rs > 0.6, p < 0.05) with alkalinity, total organic carbon (TOC), and ammonia. Results from the on-site leachate treatment system at the MSW landfill indicated reductions in COD, TOC, and ammonia; however, the ∑26PFAS concentration increased 3 % after the treatment. Overall, results demonstrated that differences between landfill types and fluctuations in PFAS within landfills should be considered when designing landfill leachate collection and treatment systems to remove PFAS. The comparative analysis in this study can provide insights into optimizing leachate management for MSW and MSWA landfills.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Water Pollutants, Chemical / Refuse Disposal / Fluorocarbons Language: En Journal: Waste Manag / Waste manag. (Elms ford) / Waste management (Elms ford) Journal subject: SAUDE AMBIENTAL / TOXICOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos Country of publication: Estados Unidos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Water Pollutants, Chemical / Refuse Disposal / Fluorocarbons Language: En Journal: Waste Manag / Waste manag. (Elms ford) / Waste management (Elms ford) Journal subject: SAUDE AMBIENTAL / TOXICOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos Country of publication: Estados Unidos