Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessing quality of magnetic resonance enterography and its impact on disease assessment of ileal Crohn's disease.
Bohra, Anuj; Connoley, Declan J; Con, Danny; Segal, Jonathan P; Niewiadomski, Olga; Vasudevan, Abhinav; Langenberg, Daniel R Van; Kutaiba, Numan.
Affiliation
  • Bohra A; Department of Gastroenterology, Box Hill Hospital, Box Hill, Australia.
  • Connoley DJ; Department of Gastroenterology, Northern Hospital, Epping, Australia.
  • Con D; Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Box Hill, Australia.
  • Segal JP; Department of Gastroenterology, Box Hill Hospital, Box Hill, Australia.
  • Niewiadomski O; Department of Gastroenterology, Box Hill Hospital, Box Hill, Australia.
  • Vasudevan A; Department of Gastroenterology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia.
  • Langenberg DRV; Department of Gastroenterology, Box Hill Hospital, Box Hill, Australia.
  • Kutaiba N; Department of Gastroenterology, Box Hill Hospital, Box Hill, Australia.
Intest Res ; 22(2): 152-161, 2024 Apr.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38173229
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/

AIMS:

Assessment of quality of magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) in small bowel Crohn's disease (CD) activity evaluation has received little attention. We assessed the impact of bowel distention and motion artifact on MRE activity indices in ileal CD.

METHODS:

A cohort of patients who underwent contemporaneous MRE and colonoscopy for ileal CD assessment between 2014 and 2021 at 2 centers were audited. An abdominal radiologist blinded to clinical data reviewed each MRE, graded bowel distention and motion artifact upon a pre-specified 3-point scale and calculated the original magnetic resonance index of activity (MaRIA) and simplified MaRIA (sMaRIA), London index and CD MRE index (CDMI). Ileal endoscopic activity was graded via the Simplified Endoscopy Score for CD (SES-CD). The performance of MRE indices in discriminating active disease (SES-CD ≥3) stratified by MRE quality was measured by receiver operator characteristic analyses.

RESULTS:

One hundred and thirty-seven patients had MRE and colonoscopy within a median of 16 days (range, 0-30 days) with 63 (46%) exhibiting active disease (SES-CD ≥3). Forty-four MREs (32%) were deemed low quality due to motion artifact and/or moderate to poor distention. Low-quality MREs demonstrated reduced discriminative performance between ileal SES-CD ≥3 and MRE indices (MaRIA 0.838 vs. 0.634, sMaRIA 0.834 vs. 0.527, CDMI 0.850 vs. 0.595, London 0.748 vs. 0.511, P<0.05 for all). Individually the presence of any motion artifact markedly impacted the discriminative performance (e.g., sMaRIA area under the curve 0.544 vs. 0.814, P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS:

Image quality parameters can significantly impact MRE disease activity interpretation. Quality metrics should be reported, enabling cautious interpretation in lower-quality studies.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Intest Res Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia Country of publication: COREA DEL SUR / CORÉIA DO SUL / KR / SOUTH KOREA

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Intest Res Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia Country of publication: COREA DEL SUR / CORÉIA DO SUL / KR / SOUTH KOREA