Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Independent sector and peri-operative cardiac arrest as reported to the 7th National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists.
Cook, T M; Kane, A D; Bouch, C; Armstrong, R A; Kursumovic, E; Soar, J.
Affiliation
  • Cook TM; Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK.
  • Kane AD; School of Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  • Bouch C; Department of Anaesthesia, James Cook University Hospital, South Tees NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK.
  • Armstrong RA; Royal College of Anaesthetists, London, UK.
  • Kursumovic E; Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK.
  • Soar J; Royal College of Anaesthetists, London, UK.
Anaesthesia ; 79(4): 380-388, 2024 Apr.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38173350
ABSTRACT
The 7th National Audit Project (NAP7) of the Royal College of Anaesthetists studied peri-operative cardiac arrest including those that occurred in the independent healthcare sector, which provides around 1 in 6 NHS-funded care episodes. In total, 174 (39%) of 442 independent hospitals contacted agreed to participate. A survey examining provider preparedness for cardiac arrest had a response rate of 23 (13%), preventing useful analysis. An activity survey with 1912 responses (from a maximum of 45% of participating hospitals) showed that, compared with the NHS caseload, the independent sector caseload was less comorbid, with fewer patients at the extremes of age or who were severely obese, and with a large proportion of elective orthopaedic surgery undertaken during weekday working hours. The survey suggested suboptimal compliance rates with monitoring recommendations. Seventeen reports of independent sector peri-operative cardiac arrest comprised 2% of NAP7 reports and underreporting is likely. These patients were lower risk than NHS cases, reflecting the sector's case mix, but included cases of haemorrhage, anaphylaxis, cardiac arrhythmia and pulmonary embolus. Good and poor quality care were seen, the latter including delayed recognition and treatment of patient deterioration, and poor care delivery. Independent sector outcomes were similar to those in the NHS, though due to the case mix, improved outcomes might be anticipated. Assessment of quality of care was less often favourable for independent sector reports than NHS reports, though assessments were often uncertain, reflecting poor quality reports. Overall, NAP7 is unable to determine whether peri-operative care relating to cardiac arrest is more, equally or less safe than in the NHS.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Heart Arrest / Anaphylaxis Type of study: Guideline Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Anaesthesia Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Reino Unido Country of publication: Reino Unido

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Heart Arrest / Anaphylaxis Type of study: Guideline Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Anaesthesia Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Reino Unido Country of publication: Reino Unido