Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Biodiversity patterns of the benthic macrofaunal communities across the intertidal sedimentary shores of two Antarctic islands.
Revanales, T; Lastra, M; Sánchez-Mata, A; García-Gallego, M A; Mora, J; Rodil, I F.
Affiliation
  • Revanales T; Department of Biology, Institute of Marine Research (INMAR), University of Cádiz, 11510, Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain. Electronic address: triana.revanales@uca.es.
  • Lastra M; Marine Research Center, University of Vigo, Geoma, 36310, Vigo, Spain.
  • Sánchez-Mata A; Department of de Ecology and Animal Biology, Faculty of Marine Science, University of Vigo, 36310, Vigo, Spain.
  • García-Gallego MA; Department of de Ecology and Animal Biology, Faculty of Marine Science, University of Vigo, 36310, Vigo, Spain.
  • Mora J; Department of Zoology, Faculty of Biology, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
  • Rodil IF; Department of Biology, Institute of Marine Research (INMAR), University of Cádiz, 11510, Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain.
Mar Environ Res ; 194: 106333, 2024 Feb.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38185002
ABSTRACT
Antarctic benthic ecosystems support a unique fauna characterized by high levels of diversity and endemism. However, our knowledge of the macrofauna communities across the Antarctic intertidal sedimentary shore is limited, and their fundamental ecological features, including spatial variability, remain poorly understood. This study aimed to investigate the abundance, community structure (i.e. taxa-specific abundance), and biodiversity patterns (α-, ß-, and λ-diversity) of benthic macrofauna communities on intertidal sedimentary shores of two Antarctic islands (South Shetland archipelago, N of Antarctic Peninsula) Livingston and Deception. We conducted a quantitative sampling during two Austral summer campaigns (2004 and 2005), studying eleven intertidal sites, with five sites located on Livingston and six on Deception. Our results demonstrated a significantly higher abundance of intertidal benthic macrofauna communities on Livingston than on Deception. Furthermore, significant differences in community structure were observed between the two islands. In terms of biodiversity patterns, there were no significant differences in the number of taxa within communities (α-diversity) between the two islands. However, significant differences in the variation of community composition (determined by the number and identity of taxa) between intertidal sites (ß-diversity) were observed, shedding light on the higher total taxa count (λ-diversity) on Livingston compared to Deception. We suggest that the island-specific characteristics (e.g., granulometric characteristics, ice disturbance, sedimentation rates, and geothermal activity) determine the differences observed in macrofauna communities. However, other ecological processes and factors are operating on different spatial and temporal scales (e.g., population dynamics, biotic interactions, oceanographic conditions, and climate change) that influence the occurrence and abundance of macrofaunal taxa. Our findings contribute to the fundamental understanding of the spatial variability of these communities and provide essential information for better management decisions and conservation practices in Antarctic coastal ecosystems.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ecosystem / Biodiversity Type of study: Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Mar Environ Res Journal subject: BIOLOGIA / SAUDE AMBIENTAL / TOXICOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ecosystem / Biodiversity Type of study: Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Mar Environ Res Journal subject: BIOLOGIA / SAUDE AMBIENTAL / TOXICOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article
...