Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Exploring older people's understanding of the QOL-ACC, a new preference-based quality-of-life measure, for quality assessment and economic evaluation in aged care: the impact of cognitive impairment and dementia.
Lay, Kiri; Crocker, Matthew; Engel, Lidia; Ratcliffe, Julie; Milte, Rachel; Hutchinson, Claire.
Affiliation
  • Lay K; Health and Social Care Economics Group, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia. kiri.lay@flinders.edu.au.
  • Crocker M; Health and Social Care Economics Group, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.
  • Engel L; Health Economics Division, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Ratcliffe J; Health and Social Care Economics Group, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.
  • Milte R; Health and Social Care Economics Group, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.
  • Hutchinson C; Health and Social Care Economics Group, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.
Health Qual Life Outcomes ; 22(1): 4, 2024 Jan 07.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38185654
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Quality-of-life is an essential outcome for quality assessment and economic evaluation in health and social care. The-Quality-of-Life - Aged Care Consumers (QOL-ACC) is a new preference-based quality-of-life measure, psychometrically validated with older people in aged care. More evidence is needed to inform the self-report reliability of the QOL-ACC in older people with varying levels of cognitive impairment and dementia.

METHODS:

A think-aloud protocol was developed and applied with older residents. The Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) was applied to assign participants to no cognitive impairment (NCI - MMSE score ≥ 27) and cognitive impairment (MMCI - MMSE score < 27) subgroups. Three independent raters utilised a Tourangeau survey response model-based framework to identify response issues. Data were compared across cognition subgroups and synthesized using a 'traffic light' grading to classify frequency and type of response issues. Gradings were utilised to assess self-report reliability according to different levels of cognitive impairment.

RESULTS:

Qualitative data from 44 participants (NCI = 20, MMCI = 24) were included for analysis. Response issues were more evident in the cognitive impairment subgroup than the no cognitive impairment subgroup. All participants who received a 'red' grade had an MMSE score of < 20 and 66% of 'amber' grades occurred in the cognitive impairment subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS:

The QOL-ACC is able to be completed reliably by older residents with an MMSE score > 17. Future research is needed to assess the generalisability of these findings to other preference-based quality of life instruments and for older people in other care settings including health systems.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Dementia / Cognitive Dysfunction Type of study: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Aged / Humans Language: En Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Journal subject: SAUDE PUBLICA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Dementia / Cognitive Dysfunction Type of study: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Aged / Humans Language: En Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Journal subject: SAUDE PUBLICA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia