Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prophylactic distal perfusion catheter and survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Secondary analysis of the SAVE-J II study.
Honzawa, Hiroshi; Taniguchi, Hayato; Abe, Takeru; Takeuchi, Ichiro; Inoue, Akihiko; Hifumi, Toru; Sakamoto, Tetsuya; Kuroda, Yasuhiro.
Affiliation
  • Honzawa H; Emergency Care Department, Yokohama City University Hospital, Yokohama, Japan. Electronic address: doubleh330@gmail.com.
  • Taniguchi H; Advanced Critical Care and Emergency Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
  • Abe T; Advanced Critical Care and Emergency Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
  • Takeuchi I; Emergency Care Department, Yokohama City University Hospital, Yokohama, Japan; Advanced Critical Care and Emergency Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
  • Inoue A; Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Hyogo Emergency Medical Center, Kobe, Japan.
  • Hifumi T; Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Sakamoto T; Department of Emergency Medicine, Teikyo University school of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Kuroda Y; Department of Emergency, Disaster and Critical Care Medicine, Kagawa University Hospital, Kagawa, Japan.
Am J Emerg Med ; 78: 69-75, 2024 04.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38237215
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The effect of a prophylactic distal perfusion catheter (DPC) after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to clarify the association between prophylactic DPC and prognosis in patients with OHCA undergoing ECPR. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A secondary analysis of the Study of Advanced Life Support for Ventricular Fibrillation with Extracorporeal Circulation in Japan (SAVE-J II) database was performed to compare groups of patients with and without prophylactic DPCs. A multivariate analysis of survival at discharge was performed using factors that were significant in the two-arm comparison.

RESULTS:

A total of 2044 patients were included in the analysis after excluding those who met the exclusion criteria. Survival at discharge was observed in 548 (26.9%) patients. In total, 100 (4.9%) patients developed limb ischemia, among whom 14 (0.7%) required therapeutic intervention. Multivariate analysis showed that prophylactic DPC did not result in a significant difference in survival at discharge (odds ratio 0.898 [0.652-1.236], p = 0.509).

CONCLUSIONS:

The implementation of prophylactic DPC after ECPR for patients with OHCA may not contribute to survival at discharge.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation / Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation / Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Am J Emerg Med Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: Estados Unidos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation / Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation / Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Am J Emerg Med Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: Estados Unidos