Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Survival Rates and Patient-Reported Outcomes Support the Use of Custom Cement-Over Megaprosthesis (CCOM) in Complex Revision Lower Limb Arthroplasty.
Ali, Asad; Ahmed, Iftikhar; Shearman, Alex; McCulloch, Robert; Carrington, Richard; Skinner, John.
Affiliation
  • Ali A; Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, United Kingdom.
  • Ahmed I; Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, United Kingdom.
  • Shearman A; Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, United Kingdom.
  • McCulloch R; Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, United Kingdom.
  • Carrington R; Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, United Kingdom.
  • Skinner J; Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, United Kingdom.
J Arthroplasty ; 39(7): 1811-1819, 2024 Jul.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38244641
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Patients presenting with periprosthetic osteolysis or fracture between ipsilateral hip and knee arthroplasties are challenging to treat successfully. Long-stem implants, osteopenic bones, and patient comorbidities all represent considerable surgical challenges. Poor results of fracture fixation in this group, coupled with the desire to retain well-performing implants and minimize soft-tissue trauma led to the developmentof the custom cement-over megaprostheses (CCOM). The aims of the study were to evaluate implant survivals, complications, and patient outcomes in those undergoing CCOM within our institution.

METHODS:

A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing CCOM between 2002 and 2022 was performed. We studied 34 cases, 33 patients, one patient underwent staged bilateral surgery with 26 women and 8 men. INDICATIONS trauma (16), failure of implants /aseptic loosening (9), or joint pathology. The mean Charlson comorbidity index was 3.5 (range, 0 to 8). All patients were followed up (mean 75 months [range, 9 to 170]) at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and annually thereafter. The VAS, EuroQol-5D-3L and MSTS scores were collected at 1 year.

RESULTS:

Implant survival defined by the primary outcome (all-cause revision of the implant at any time point) at 12 months of 97% (32 of 33). In surviving patients, implant survival was 90% (18 of 20) and all 7 survived at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Implant survival including those in the primary outcome group and those free of infection at 12 months was 84.8% (28 of 33) and in surviving patients, implant survival was 70% (14 of 20) and 7 out of 7 at 5 and 10 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

The CCOM technique demonstrates good implant survivorships and satisfactory patient-reported outcomes in complex, often frail patients who have compromised bone stock. This series confirms the technique as an established alternative to total femoral replacement in these cases.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prosthesis Design / Reoperation / Bone Cements / Prosthesis Failure / Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / Patient Reported Outcome Measures Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Arthroplasty / J. arthroplasty / Journal of arthroplasty Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Reino Unido Country of publication: Estados Unidos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prosthesis Design / Reoperation / Bone Cements / Prosthesis Failure / Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / Patient Reported Outcome Measures Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Arthroplasty / J. arthroplasty / Journal of arthroplasty Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Reino Unido Country of publication: Estados Unidos