Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sex differences in remission rates over 24 weeks among three different biological treatments compared to conventional therapy in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (NORD-STAR): a post-hoc analysis of a randomised controlled trial.
Lend, Kristina; van Vollenhoven, Ronald F; Lampa, Jon; Lund Hetland, Merete; Haavardsholm, Espen A; Nordström, Dan; Nurmohamed, Michael; Gudbjornsson, Bjorn; Rudin, Anna; Østergaard, Mikkel; Uhlig, Till; Grondal, Gerdur; Hørslev-Petersen, Kim; Heiberg, Marte S; Sokka-Isler, Tuulikki; Koopman, Frieda A; Twisk, Jos W R; van der Horst-Bruinsma, Irene.
Affiliation
  • Lend K; Department of Rheumatology and Amsterdam Rheumatology Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Medicine, Rheumatology Unit, Center for Molecular Medicine (CMM), Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. Electronic address: kristina.lend@ki.se.
  • van Vollenhoven RF; Department of Rheumatology and Amsterdam Rheumatology Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Medicine, Rheumatology Unit, Center for Molecular Medicine (CMM), Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Lampa J; Department of Medicine, Rheumatology Unit, Center for Molecular Medicine (CMM), Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Medicine, Rheumatology Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Lund Hetland M; Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE) and DANBIO, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Haavardsholm EA; Division of Rheumatology and Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Nordström D; Department of Medicine and Rheumatology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Nurmohamed M; Department of Rheumatology and Amsterdam Rheumatology Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Reade, Netherlands.
  • Gudbjornsson B; Department of Rheumatology, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
  • Rudin A; Rheumatology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Østergaard M; Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE) and DANBIO, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Uhlig T; Division of Rheumatology and Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Grondal G; Department of Rheumatology, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
  • Hørslev-Petersen K; Danish Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Sønderborg, Denmark; Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
  • Heiberg MS; Division of Rheumatology and Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Sokka-Isler T; Department of Medicine and University of Eastern Finland, Jyväskylä Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland.
  • Koopman FA; Department of Rheumatology and Amsterdam Rheumatology Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Twisk JWR; Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • van der Horst-Bruinsma I; Department of Rheumatology, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Lancet Rheumatol ; 4(10): e688-e698, 2022 Oct.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38265967
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic inflammatory disease with a well-recognised female preponderance. In this post-hoc analysis of the NORD-STAR trial, we aimed to examine sex differences in remission rates with three different biological treatments combined with methotrexate versus active conventional treatment over 24 weeks, in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS:

NORD-STAR was a multicentre, investigator-initiated, assessor-blinded, phase 4, randomised, controlled trial of early rheumatoid arthritis, done in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, and the Netherlands. Newly diagnosed patients, naive to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, aged 18 years or older with early rheumatoid arthritis and with a symptom duration less than 24 months were randomly assigned (1111) to receive active conventional treatment, certolizumab-pegol, abatacept, or tocilizumab. Sex was reported in case report forms by study physicians or by study nurses. Data on gender were not collected. Remission outcomes were analysed with logistic generalised estimating equations (GEE), using a logit link and exchangeable correlation matrix. The model included treatment, time, sex, and the relevant interactions. For this post-hoc analysis, the co-primary outcomes were differences in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission (CDAI score ≤2·8) between sexes over time and at week 24, assessed with interaction terms (men vs women within each treatment comparison) and using active conventional treatment as the reference. We present adjusted average marginal differences in remission rates (risk differences) with 95% CIs.

FINDINGS:

Between Dec 14, 2012, and Dec 11, 2018, 812 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned; 217 received active conventional treatment, 203 received certolizumab-pegol, 204 received abatacept, and 188 received tocilizumab. All 812 patients were included in this analysis; 561 (69%) were women and 251 (31%) were men. Observed CDAI remission rates at 24 weeks were numerically higher among men than among women despite comparable disease activity at baseline (55% vs 50% with active conventional treatment, 57% vs 52% with certolizumab-pegol, 65% vs 51% with abatacept, and 61% vs 40% with tocilizumab). In the adjusted analysis, with active conventional treatment as the reference, the only significant difference between men and women was in the tocilizumab group (pinteraction=0·015); men in the tocilizumab group had a higher probability of CDAI remission, on average over time, than did men in the active conventional treatment group (0·12; 95% CI 0·00 to 0·23), whereas women in the tocilizumab group had a lower probability of remission than did women in the active conventional treatment group (-0·05, 95% CI -0·13 to 0·02).

INTERPRETATION:

Numerically higher remission rates were observed in men than in women in all four treatment groups at week 24, suggesting that this generalised sex difference is not related to the treatment. The difference between men and women was significantly greater with tocilizumab, an interleukin (IL)-6 inhibitor, than with active conventional treatment, suggesting a possible additional sex-based effect specific for IL-6 blockade.

FUNDING:

None.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Arthritis, Rheumatoid / Sex Characteristics Type of study: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Lancet Rheumatol Year: 2022 Document type: Article Country of publication: Reino Unido

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Arthritis, Rheumatoid / Sex Characteristics Type of study: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Lancet Rheumatol Year: 2022 Document type: Article Country of publication: Reino Unido