Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Countering online marketing and user endorsements with enhanced cannabis warning labels: An online experiment among at-risk youth and young adults.
Yang, Sijia; Cotter, Lynne M; Lu, Linqi; Kriss, Lauren A; Minich, Matt; Liu, Jiaying; Silver, Lynn D; Cascio, Christopher N.
Affiliation
  • Yang S; School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States of America. Electronic address: sijia.yang@alumni.upenn.edu.
  • Cotter LM; School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States of America.
  • Lu L; School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States of America.
  • Kriss LA; School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States of America; UT Center for Health Communication, Austin, TX, United States of America.
  • Minich M; School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States of America.
  • Liu J; Department of Communication, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, United States of America.
  • Silver LD; Public Health Institute, Oakland, CA, United States of America.
  • Cascio CN; School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States of America.
Prev Med ; 180: 107877, 2024 Mar.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38266719
ABSTRACT
As cannabis legalization expands and online marketing intensifies, this study examines whether online social cues can amplify youth-targeted cannabis advertising and whether cannabis warning labels (CWLs) can counteract these influences. A U.S. online sample of 970 adolescents and 1776 young adults susceptible to cannabis use were recruited from Qualtrics in summer 2022. Each participant was randomly assigned to one of the 3 (CWLs none vs. textual vs. pictorial) by 3 (

comments:

none vs. anti-cannabis vs. pro-cannabis) conditions in an online experiment. Participants were exposed to three online marketing posts promoting marijuana edibles (randomly selected from a large pool, N = 1260), each with either no warning label, a textual warning, or a pictorial warning (text and picture), and with either five comments (pro- or anti-cannabis in valence) or none. Results showed that among adolescents, pro-cannabis comments increased product appeal (vs. anti-cannabis

comments:

b = 0.18, p = .025; vs. no

comments:

b = 0.21, p = .021), and did so more than young adults. For adolescents, only pictorial warnings reduced product appeal (b = -0.20, p = .028). For young adults, both pictorial (b = -0.18, p = .002) and textual warnings (b = -0.12, p = .029) reduced product appeal. Furthermore, both textual (adolescents b = -0.20, p = .004; young adults b = -0.15, p = .005) and pictorial (adolescents b = -0.30, p < .001; young adults b = -0.18, p = .001) warnings reduced cannabis use intentions. Findings support requiring enhanced CWLs accompany online marketing ads.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cannabis / Tobacco Products Type of study: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Humans Language: En Journal: Prev Med Year: 2024 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cannabis / Tobacco Products Type of study: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Humans Language: En Journal: Prev Med Year: 2024 Document type: Article