Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Performance of the Dexcom G7 Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Pregnant Women with Diabetes.
Polsky, Sarit; Valent, Amy M; Isganaitis, Elvira; Castorino, Kristin; O'Malley, Grenye; Beck, Stayce E; Gao, Peggy; Laffel, Lori M; Brown, Florence M; Levy, Carol J.
Affiliation
  • Polsky S; Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
  • Valent AM; Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
  • Isganaitis E; Joslin Diabetes Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Castorino K; Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara, California, USA.
  • O'Malley G; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
  • Beck SE; Department of Clinical Affairs, Dexcom, Inc., San Diego, California, USA.
  • Gao P; Department of Clinical Affairs, Dexcom, Inc., San Diego, California, USA.
  • Laffel LM; Joslin Diabetes Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Brown FM; Joslin Diabetes Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Levy CJ; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Diabetes Technol Ther ; 26(5): 307-312, 2024 May.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38315503
ABSTRACT

Background:

We evaluated accuracy and safety of a seventh-generation real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system during pregnancy. Materials and

Methods:

Evaluable data for accuracy analysis were obtained from 96 G7 sensors (Dexcom, Inc.) worn by 96 of 105 enrolled pregnant women with type 1 (n = 59), type 2 (n = 21), or gestational diabetes (n = 25). CGM values were compared with arterialized venous glucose values from the YSI comparator instrument during 6-h clinic sessions at different time points throughout the sensors' 10-day wear period. The primary endpoint was the proportion of CGM values in the 70-180 mg/dL range within 15% of comparator glucose values. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of CGM values within 20% or 20 mg/dL of comparator values ≥ or <100 mg/dL, respectively (the %20/20 agreement rate).

Results:

Of the 1739 pairs with CGM in the 70-180 mg/dL range, 83.2% were within 15% of comparator values. The lower bound of the 95% confidence interval was 79.8%. Of the 2102 pairs with CGM values in the 40-400 mg/dL range, the %20/20 agreement rate was 92.5%. Of the 1659 pairs with comparator values in the 63-140 mg/dL range, the %20/20 agreement rate was 92.3%. The %20/20 agreement rates on days 1, 4 and 7, and 10 were 78.6%, 96.3%, and 97.3%, respectively. Consensus error grid analysis showed 99.8% of pairs in the clinically acceptable A and B zones. There were no serious adverse events. The sensors' 10-day survival rate was 90.3%.

Conclusion:

The G7 system is accurate and safe during pregnancies complicated by diabetes and does not require confirmatory fingerstick testing. Clinical Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov NCT04905628.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pregnancy in Diabetics / Diabetes, Gestational / Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 / Continuous Glucose Monitoring Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther / Diabetes technol. ther / Diabetes technology & therapeutics Journal subject: ENDOCRINOLOGIA / TERAPEUTICA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos Country of publication: Estados Unidos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pregnancy in Diabetics / Diabetes, Gestational / Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 / Continuous Glucose Monitoring Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther / Diabetes technol. ther / Diabetes technology & therapeutics Journal subject: ENDOCRINOLOGIA / TERAPEUTICA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos Country of publication: Estados Unidos