Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Infection prevention for immunocompromised patients: A cross-translational multicentric survey of current organization in France.
Saade, A; Wyplosz, B; Baldeyrou, M; Paris, C; Tattevin, P; Janssen, C.
Affiliation
  • Saade A; Centre régional de Pathologies professionnelles et environnementales Bretagne, Rennes, France; Service de Maladies Infectieuses et Réanimation Médicale, CHU de Rennes, Rennes, France; IRSET, Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France. Electronic address: Anastasia.saade@gmail.com.
  • Wyplosz B; AP-HP, Service de maladies infectieuses et tropicales, CHU Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
  • Baldeyrou M; Service de Maladies Infectieuses et Réanimation Médicale, CHU de Rennes, Rennes, France.
  • Paris C; Centre régional de Pathologies professionnelles et environnementales Bretagne, Rennes, France; IRSET, Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France.
  • Tattevin P; Service de Maladies Infectieuses et Réanimation Médicale, CHU de Rennes, Rennes, France.
  • Janssen C; Centre Hospitalier Annecy Genevois, Service des maladies infectieuses et tropicales, F-74374 Annecy, France.
Infect Dis Now ; 54(2): 104863, 2024 Mar.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38340891
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To evaluate current organization of infection prevention for immunocompromised patients (ICP) at a countrywide level.

METHODS:

Nationwide cross-sectional multicenter study based on an online survey disseminated in 2022 to physicians invested with preventive healthcare missions.

RESULTS:

A total of 341 physicians (96% graduates, 32% infectious disease specialists), participated in the survey, with a median age of 40 [35-51] years. On-site access to infection prevention consultations for ICP was reported by 30%, dedicated pre-travel consultations for ICPs by 29%, consultations for infection prevention in solid organ transplant candidates by 16% and return-to-work consultations for ICPs by 6%. Most participants (73%) were aware of nationwide vaccination guidelines for ICP, while 50% felt comfortable using them. Tools for infection prevention advice and ICP vaccination had been developed by 10%, while 89% would have appreciated access to tools developed by others.

CONCLUSIONS:

Infection prevention for ICPs remains neglected. Guidelines covering all fields of prevention for ICPs would be more than welcome.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Immunocompromised Host / Health Facilities Type of study: Clinical_trials / Qualitative_research Limits: Adult / Humans / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Infect Dis Now Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: Francia

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Immunocompromised Host / Health Facilities Type of study: Clinical_trials / Qualitative_research Limits: Adult / Humans / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Infect Dis Now Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: Francia