Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Changes in benign prostatic hyperplasia management in Valencia: a real-world evidence analysis.
Navarro-Pérez, J; López Alcina, E; Calabiug Pérez, J; Brotons Muntó, F; Martínez, A; Vallejo, L; Jiménez, J.
Affiliation
  • Navarro-Pérez J; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, INCLIVA, Universidad de Valencia, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Valencia, Spain. Electronic address: navarro_jorge@gva.es.
  • López Alcina E; Servicio de Urología del Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
  • Calabiug Pérez J; Servicio de Análisis de Sistemas de Información Sanitaria, Conselleria de Sanidad Universal y Salud Pública, Valencia, Spain.
  • Brotons Muntó F; Centro de Salud Trinitat, Valencia, Spain.
  • Martínez A; Departamento Médico, GlaxoSmithKline, Madrid, Spain.
  • Vallejo L; Departamento Market Access, GlaxoSmithKline, Madrid, Spain.
  • Jiménez J; Departamento Market Access, GlaxoSmithKline, Madrid, Spain.
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed) ; 48(6): 461-469, 2024.
Article in En, Es | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38369289
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION AND

OBJECTIVES:

A training program was developed to increase general practitioners' engagement in the optimal management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH). The goal of this study was to evaluate changes in BPH management after the implementation of a training program. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

This observational retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2019 and 2020. Aggregated data were analyzed in three evaluation periods (2010, 2012 and 2015), addressing quality indicators for diagnosis, treatment, and treatment outcomes.

RESULTS:

Overall, 118 795 patients who presented any data points were included. All quality indicators (number of IPSS and PSA determinations) increased between the first period and the last. Combination (α-blocker + 5-ARI) therapy was increasingly prescribed during the study periods whereas the proportion of prescriptions for single-agent α-blocker showed no significant differences among the periods analyzed. However, the total number of patients eligible for combination therapy who actually received this treatment was low in all periods (7.5%, 17.9%, and 20.1%, in 2010, 2012, and 2015, respectively). The outcome indicators revealed a decrease in referrals to the urology unit mostly among newly diagnosed patients. Even though the proportion of patients who underwent BPH-related surgeries increased significantly from the first to the second period, the number of surgeries remained stable between the second and third periods.

CONCLUSIONS:

The training program had a generally positive impact on the management of BPH patients in PC, but the overall study period may be insufficient to show an effect on some outcome indicators such as the number of surgeries.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prostatic Hyperplasia Limits: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En / Es Journal: Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed) Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: España

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prostatic Hyperplasia Limits: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En / Es Journal: Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed) Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: España