Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessing Pharmacokinetic Correlates of Escitalopram-Related Adverse Drug Reactions.
Kuzin, Maxim; Haen, Ekkehard; Kuzo, Nazar; Endres, Katharina; Hiemke, Christoph; Paulzen, Michael; Schoretsanitis, Georgios.
Affiliation
  • Kuzin M; Clienia Schloessli, Private Psychiatric Hospital and Academic Teaching Hospital of the University of Zurich, Oetwil am See/Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Haen E; Department of Basic and Clinical Sciences at the Medical School, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus.
  • Kuzo N; Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
  • Endres K; Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
  • Hiemke C; Clinical Pharmacology, Institute AGATE gGmbH, Pentling, Germany.
  • Paulzen M; Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Hospital of Psychiatry, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Schoretsanitis G; Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Ther Drug Monit ; 46(2): 246-251, 2024 Apr 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38377253
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

To assess the pharmacokinetic correlates of reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs) under antidepressant treatment with escitalopram (ESC) using a large therapeutic drug monitoring database.

METHODS:

A large naturalistic sample of inpatients and outpatients prescribed ESC was analyzed. ADRs were classified using the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser side effect rating scale. We compared ESC-treated patients with (n = 35) and without ADRs (n = 273) using ESC plasma concentrations as the primary outcome. We also compared ADR rates in the 2 groups based on 2 cut-off ESC levels reflecting the recommended upper thresholds of the therapeutic reference range of 80 ng/mL, suggested by the consensus therapeutic drug monitoring guidelines, and 40 ng/mL, based on recent meta-analysis data. The effects of age, sex, smoking, daily ESC dose, plasma concentrations, and concentrations corrected for daily dose were included in a binary logistic regression model to predict ADRs.

RESULTS:

No differences in clinical, demographic, or pharmacokinetic parameters were observed between patients with and without ADRs ( P > 0.05). Patients with ESC-related ADRs were more frequently diagnosed with psychotic disorders than those without (25% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.004). None of the variables was associated with ADR risk. Overall, ADR rates were not significantly different in patients above versus below thresholds of ESC concentrations (ESC concentrations >40 [n = 59] vs. ≤40 ng/mL [n = 249] and >80 [n = 8] vs. ≤80 ng/mL [n = 300]; P = 0.56 and P = 1.0, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS:

No distinct pharmacokinetic patterns underlying ESC-associated ADRs were observed. Further studies with more specific assessments of ADRs in larger cohorts are required to better identify potential underlying patterns.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Psychotic Disorders / Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Ther Drug Monit Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Suiza Country of publication: Estados Unidos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Psychotic Disorders / Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Ther Drug Monit Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Suiza Country of publication: Estados Unidos