Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Improving the modelling of a multi-leaf collimator with tilted leaf sides used in radiotherapy.
Hussein, Mohammad; Angerud, Agnes; Saez, Jordi; Bogaert, Evelien; Lemire, Matthieu; Barry, Miriam; Silvestre Patallo, Ileana; Shipley, David; Clark, Catharine H; Hernandez, Victor.
Affiliation
  • Hussein M; Metrology for Medical Physics Centre, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK.
  • Angerud A; RaySearch Laboratories AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Saez J; Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Bogaert E; Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium.
  • Lemire M; CIUSSS de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Barry M; Metrology for Medical Physics Centre, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK.
  • Silvestre Patallo I; Metrology for Medical Physics Centre, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK.
  • Shipley D; Metrology for Medical Physics Centre, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK.
  • Clark CH; Metrology for Medical Physics Centre, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK.
  • Hernandez V; Medical Physics, University College London Hospital, London, UK.
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol ; 29: 100543, 2024 Jan.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38390588
ABSTRACT
Background and

purpose:

Multi-leaf collimators (MLCs) with tilted leaf sides have a complex transmission behaviour that is not easily matched by radiotherapy treatment planning systems (TPSs). We sought to develop an MLC model that can accurately match test fields and clinically relevant plans at different centres. Materials and

methods:

Two new MLC models were developed and evaluated within a research version of a commercial TPS. Prototype I used adjusted-constant transmissions and Prototype II used variable transmissions at the tongue-and-groove and leaf-tip regions. Three different centres evaluated these prototypes for a tilted MLC and compared them with their initial MLC model using test fields and patient-specific quality-assurance measurements of clinically relevant plans. For the latter, gamma passing rates (GPR) at 2 %/2mm were recorded.

Results:

For the prototypes the same set of MLC parameters could be used at all centres, with only a slight adjustment of the offset parameter. For centres A and C, average GPR were >95 % and within 0.5 % GPR difference between the standard, and prototype models. In center B, prototypes I and II improved the agreement in clinically relevant plans, with an increase in GPR of 2.3 % ± 0.8 % and 3.0 ± 0.8 %, respectively.

Conclusions:

The prototype MLC models were either similar or superior to the initial MLC model, and simpler to configure because fewer trade-offs were required. Prototype I performed comparably to the more sophisticated Prototype II and its configuration can be easily standardized, which can be useful to reduce variability and improve safety in clinical practice.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Reino Unido Country of publication: HOLANDA / HOLLAND / NETHERLANDS / NL / PAISES BAJOS / THE NETHERLANDS

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Reino Unido Country of publication: HOLANDA / HOLLAND / NETHERLANDS / NL / PAISES BAJOS / THE NETHERLANDS