Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Does Spinal Cord Type Predict Intraoperative Neuro-Monitoring Alerts in Scoliosis Correction Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Operative and Radiologic Predictors.
Al-Naseem, Abdulrahman O; Al-Naseem, Abdulaziz O; Cawley, Derek T; Aoude, Ahmed; Catanzano, Anthony A; Abd-El-Barr, Muhammad M; Sharma, Aman; Shafafy, Roozbeh.
Affiliation
  • Al-Naseem AO; Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
  • Al-Naseem AO; Department of Spinal Surgery, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Stanmore, UK.
  • Cawley DT; School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
  • Aoude A; Department of Spine Surgery, Mater Private Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Catanzano AA; Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada.
  • Abd-El-Barr MM; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Sharma A; Division of Spine, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Shafafy R; Department of Spinal Surgery, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Stanmore, UK.
Global Spine J ; : 21925682241237475, 2024 Mar 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38428951
ABSTRACT
STUDY

DESIGN:

Systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES:

Predicting patient risk of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) alerts preoperatively can aid patient counselling and surgical planning. Sielatycki et al established an axial-MRI-based spinal cord classification system to predict risk of IONM alerts in scoliosis correction surgery. We aim to systematically review the literature on operative and radiologic factors associated with IONM alerts, including a novel spinal cord classification.

METHODS:

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) Guidelines. A literature search identifying all observational studies comparing patients with and without IONM alerts was conducted. Suitable studies were included. Patient demographics, radiological measures and operative factors were collected.

RESULTS:

11 studies were included including 3040 patients. Relative to type 3 cords, type 1 (OR = .03, CI = .01-.08, P < .00001), type 2 (OR = .08, CI = .03, P <.00001) and all non-type 3 cords (OR = .05, CI = .02-.16, P < .00001) were associated with significantly lower odds of IONM alerts. Significant radiographic measures for IONM alerts included coronal Cobb angle (MD = 10.66, CI = 5.77-15.56, P < .00001), sagittal Cobb angle (MD = 9.27, CI = 3.28-14.73, P = .0009), sagittal deformity angle ratio (SDAR) (MD = 2.76, CI = 1.57-3.96, P < .00001) and total deformity angle ratio (TDAR) (MD = 3.44, CI = 2.27-4.462, P < .00001). Clinically, estimated blood loss (MD = 274.13, CI = -240.03-788.28, P = .30), operation duration (MD = 50.79, CI = 20.58-81.00, P = .0010), number of levels fused (MD = .92, CI = .43-1.41, P = .0002) and number of vertebral levels resected (MD = .43, CI = .01-.84, P = .05) were significantly greater in IONM alert patients.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study highlights the relationship of operative and radiologic factors with IONM alerts.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Global Spine J Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Reino Unido

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Global Spine J Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Reino Unido