Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is there a difference in the clinical profile and outcome of women using levonorgestrel IUD for abnormal uterine bleeding and those using it for contraception?: A comparative cross-sectional study.
Al Shukri, Maryam; Said, Maryam; Nair, Asha; Mathew, Mariam; Gowri, Vaidyanatahn.
Affiliation
  • Al Shukri M; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.
  • Said M; College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.
  • Nair A; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.
  • Mathew M; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.
  • Gowri V; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.
Turk J Obstet Gynecol ; 21(1): 7-14, 2024 Mar 04.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38440962
ABSTRACT

Objective:

The most common indications for Levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) are contraception and management of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). This study was conducted with the aim of exploring the differences in the clinical profile and outcome of women using LNG-IUD for contraception and AUB. Materials and

Methods:

This was a retrospective comparative cross-sectional study of women who underwent LNG-IUD (52 mg) between 2012 and 2017. Their electronic health records were reviewed until the last documented follow-up or until December 2021.

Results:

A total of 235 women had LNG-IUD with an age range of 21 to 62 years and a mean of (37.98 years±6.76). Of these women, 153/235 (65.1%) had it for contraception and 82/235 (34.89%) had it for AUB. The follow-up was 1-94 months with (mean ± SEM) follow-up for the AUB group of (21.48±2.31) months and for contraception group was (20.74±1.76) months (p-value of 0.80). There was a significant difference between the two groups in the age and body mass index (BMI), where women who had LNG-IUD for AUB were older (mean of 42.54±6.49 years, p-value <0.001) and had higher BMI (31.88±7.52 kg/m2, p-value =0.011). All LNG-IUDs that were indicated for contraception were inserted in an outpatient setting. However, 68.3% in the AUB, the insertion was in the operating theater in conjunction with hysteroscopy. After combining both expulsion and removal of LNG-IUD during the follow-up period, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in the overall retention rate during the follow-up (p-value =0.998).

Conclusion:

this study shows that women using LNG-IUD for the management of AUB are older and have a higher BMI compared with those using it for contraception. AUB women experienced more expulsion compared with the contraception group, but there was no difference between the 2 groups in the overall survival/retention of LNG-IUD.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Turk J Obstet Gynecol Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Omán

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Turk J Obstet Gynecol Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Omán
...