Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Segmentation of Mass in Mammogram Using Gaze Search Patterns].
Okumura, Eiichiro; Kato, Hideki; Honmoto, Tsuyoshi; Suzuki, Nobutada; Okumura, Erika; Higashigawa, Takuji; Kitamura, Shigemi; Ando, Jiro; Ishida, Takayuki.
Affiliation
  • Okumura E; Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Tsukuba International University.
  • Kato H; Department of Radiological Science, Faculty of Health Science, Gunma Paz University.
  • Honmoto T; Department of Radiological Technology, Ibaraki Children's Hospital.
  • Suzuki N; Department of Radiology, Eastern Chiba Medical Center.
  • Okumura E; Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Tsukuba International University.
  • Higashigawa T; Group of Visual Measurement, Department of Technology, Nac Image Technology.
  • Kitamura S; Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Tsukuba International University.
  • Ando J; Hospital Director, Tochigi Cancer Center.
  • Ishida T; Division of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University.
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi ; 80(5): 487-498, 2024 May 20.
Article in Ja | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38479883
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

It is very difficult for a radiologist to correctly detect small lesions and lesions hidden on dense breast tissue on a mammogram. Therefore, recently, computer-aided detection (CAD) systems have been widely used to assist radiologists in interpreting images. Thus, in this study, we aimed to segment mass on the mammogram with high accuracy by using focus images obtained from an eye-tracking device.

METHODS:

We obtained focus images for two mammography expert radiologists and 19 mammography technologists on 8 abnormal and 8 normal mammograms published by the DDSM. Next, the auto-encoder, Pix2Pix, and UNIT learned the relationship between the actual mammogram and the focus image, and generated the focus image for the unknown mammogram. Finally, we segmented regions of mass on mammogram using the U-Net for each focus image generated by the auto-encoder, Pix2Pix, and UNIT.

RESULTS:

The dice coefficient in the UNIT was 0.64±0.14. The dice coefficient in the UNIT was higher than that in the auto-encoder and Pix2Pix, and there was a statistically significant difference (p<0.05). The dice coefficient of the proposed method, which combines the focus images generated by the UNIT and the original mammogram, was 0.66±0.15, which is equivalent to the method using the original mammogram.

CONCLUSION:

In the future, it will be necessary to increase the number of cases and further improve the segmentation.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Breast Neoplasms / Mammography Limits: Female / Humans Language: Ja Journal: Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: Japón

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Breast Neoplasms / Mammography Limits: Female / Humans Language: Ja Journal: Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: Japón