Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Liver volumetry and liver-regenerative interventions: history, rationale, and emerging tools.
Haddad, Antony; Lendoire, Mateo; Maki, Harufumi; Kang, Hyunseon Christine; Habibollahi, Peiman; Odisio, Bruno C; Huang, Steven Y; Vauthey, Jean-Nicolas.
Affiliation
  • Haddad A; Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States.
  • Lendoire M; Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States.
  • Maki H; Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States.
  • Kang HC; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States.
  • Habibollahi P; Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States.
  • Odisio BC; Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States.
  • Huang SY; Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States.
  • Vauthey JN; Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States. Electronic address: jvauthey@mdanderson.org.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 28(5): 766-775, 2024 May.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38519362
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Postoperative hepatic insufficiency (PHI) is the most feared complication after hepatectomy. Volume of the future liver remnant (FLR) is one objectively measurable indicator to identify patients at risk of PHI. In this review, we summarized the development and rationale for the use of liver volumetry and liver-regenerative interventions and highlighted emerging tools that could yield new advancements in liver volumetry.

METHODS:

A review of MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted to identify literature related to liver volumetry. The references of relevant articles were reviewed to identify additional publications.

RESULTS:

Liver volumetry based on radiologic imaging was developed in the 1980s to identify patients at risk of PHI and later used in the 1990s to evaluate grafts for living donor living transplantation. The field evolved in the 2000s by the introduction of standardized FLR based on the hepatic metabolic demands and in the 2010s by the introduction of the degree of hypertrophy and kinetic growth rate as measures of the FLR regenerative and functional capacity. Several liver-regenerative interventions, most notably portal vein embolization, are used to increase resectability and reduce the risk of PHI. In parallel with the increase in automation and machine assistance to physicians, many semi- and fully automated tools are being developed to facilitate liver volumetry.

CONCLUSION:

Liver volumetry is the most reliable tool to detect patients at risk of PHI. Advances in imaging analysis technologies, newly developed functional measures, and liver-regenerative interventions have been improving our ability to perform safe hepatectomy.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Hepatectomy / Liver / Liver Regeneration Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Hepatectomy / Liver / Liver Regeneration Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos