Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Does acute cannabidiol (CBD) use impair performance? A meta-analysis and comparison with placebo and delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC).
Lo, Lindsay A; Christiansen, April L; Strickland, Justin C; Pistawka, Carly A; Eadie, Lauren; Vandrey, Ryan; MacCallum, Caroline A.
Affiliation
  • Lo LA; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Christiansen AL; School of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
  • Strickland JC; Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Pistawka CA; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Eadie L; Faculty of Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Vandrey R; Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • MacCallum CA; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Neuropsychopharmacology ; 49(9): 1425-1436, 2024 Aug.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38528133
ABSTRACT
Cannabidiol (CBD) is widely used and believed to be non-intoxicating, lacking acute performance effects (e.g., non-impairing). However, a synthesis of data has not evaluated this. This meta-analysis synthesized data from controlled human laboratory studies that evaluated if acute CBD use impairs performance. Performance on objective and subjective measures of cognitive and psychomotor function were used as markers for potential performance changes and impairment. Studies were identified through systematic database searches. Adult clinical trials measuring acute CBD effects (within 0-8 h of administration) were included. The primary outcome was the peak mean difference in performance measures between CBD and placebo. A secondary analysis utilizing delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) as a positive control for comparison to CBD was completed. Pooled Hedges' g estimates were calculated using robust variance estimation (RVE) meta-regression. The omnibus RVE meta-analysis indicated a statistically significant, but small effect size (Hedge's g < 0.2) for impaired performance following acute CBD consumption compared to placebo (N = 16 trials, Hedges' g = 0.122, 95% CI 0.023-0.221, p = 0.019). Measure type was a significant moderator with larger mean differences between CBD and placebo when subjective measures, specifically self-reported sedation, were used versus objective performance tasks (Hedges' gSubjective = 0.288 versus Hedges' gObjective = 0.048). Δ9-THC had a significantly greater magnitude of impairment compared to CBD (N = 8, Hedges' g = 0.416, 95% CI 0.017-0.816, p = 0.043). In summary, acute CBD consumption was associated with a small increase in subjective ratings of sedation, but no difference from placebo was observed across multiple domains of objectively assessed cognitive or psychomotor performance. These findings suggest that acute CBD alone is unlikely to significantly impair daily functioning or workplace performance.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Psychomotor Performance / Dronabinol / Cannabidiol Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Neuropsychopharmacol / Neuropsychopharmacology Journal subject: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFARMACOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canadá Country of publication: Reino Unido

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Psychomotor Performance / Dronabinol / Cannabidiol Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Neuropsychopharmacol / Neuropsychopharmacology Journal subject: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFARMACOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canadá Country of publication: Reino Unido