Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validating evidence for the knowledge, management and involvement of dentists in a dental approach to sickle-cell disease.
Ancillotti, Lucia Helena da Silva Ferreira; Abreu, Mauro Henrique Nogueira Guimarães de; Marinho, Angélica Maria Cupertino Lopes; Santos, Marcia Pereira Alves Dos.
Affiliation
  • Ancillotti LHDSF; Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ, School of Dentistry, Department of Community and Preventive Dentistry, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
  • Abreu MHNG; Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG, School of Dentistry, Department of Community and Preventive Dentistry, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
  • Marinho AMCL; Faculdade de Teologia, Filosofia e Ciências Humanas de Gamaliel - Fatefig, Tucuruí, PA, Brazil.
  • Santos MPAD; Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ, School of Dentistry, Department of Community and Preventive Dentistry, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Braz Oral Res ; 38: e026, 2024.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38597546
ABSTRACT
This study validated the content of an instrument designed to assess the knowledge, involvement (attitudes) and management (practice) of dentists relative to sickle-cell disease (KAPD-SCD). The instrument consisted of five domains composed of a total of thirteen items I. Dentist's self-assessment relative to sickle-cell disease; II. Dentist's knowledge of the repercussions of sickle-cell disease on the stomatognathic system; III. Dentist's knowledge of the complications of sickle-cell disease in the stomatognathic system; IV. Dentist's knowledge concerning the dental management of sickle-cell disease patients; and V. Dentist's involvement in an approach to sickle-cell disease. Twelve experts assigned scores to each item of the instrument. The criteria were clarity, understanding and appropriateness, leaving open fields for comments. Descriptive and content analyses of the data were made. Each expert analyzed 39 assessment units. The percentages considered for agreement were high (>80%), medium (70%-80%), or low (<70%), and each item was maintained or revised according to the percentage observed. There was high consensus in 74% of the assessment units (the corresponding items were maintained), medium consensus in 24% of them (the corresponding items were revised), and disagreement in 2% of them, namely as regards the "appropriateness" of item 5 ("Are there oral complications in sickle-cell disease?"), which was revised. The final version of the instrument had 16 items for different applications such as in the clinical care program, teaching program, or research program, with different cut-off scores for each application. In conclusion, the level of agreement among experts showed evidence of the content validity of the instrument.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Anemia, Sickle Cell Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Braz Oral Res Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Brasil

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Anemia, Sickle Cell Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Braz Oral Res Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Brasil