Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Untangling the perception of value in value-based healthcare - an interview study.
Wolf, Axel; Erichsen Andersson, Annette; Wikström, Ewa; Bååthe, Fredrik.
Affiliation
  • Wolf A; Institute of Health Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden and Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Erichsen Andersson A; Institute of Health Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden and Department of Orthopedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Wikström E; Department of Business Administration, School of Business, Economics and Law, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden, and.
  • Bååthe F; Institute for Studies of the Medical Profession, LEFO, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Stress Medicine at Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden and Institute of Health Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl) ; 37(5): 130-141, 2024 Apr 16.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38635293
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Value-based health care (VBHC) argues that health-care needs to re-focus to maximise value creation, defining value as the quota when dividing the outcomes important for the patient, by the cost for health care to deliver such outcomes. This study aims to explore the perception of value among different stakeholders involved in the process of implementing VBHC at a Swedish hospital to support leaders to be more efficient and effective when developing health care. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/

APPROACH:

Participants comprised 19 clinicians and non-clinicians involved in the implementation of VBHC. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and content analysis was performed.

FINDINGS:

The clinicians described value as a dynamic concept, dependent on the patient and the clinical setting, stating that improving outcomes was more important than containing costs. The value for non-clinicians appeared more driven by the interplay between the outcome and the cost. Non-clinicians related VBHC to a strategic framework for governance or for monitoring different continuous improvement processes, while clinicians appreciated VBHC, as they perceived its introduction as an opportunity to focus more on outcomes for patients and less on cost containment. ORIGINALITY/VALUE There is variation in how clinicians and non-clinicians perceive the key concept of value when implementing VBHC. Clinicians focus on increasing treatment efficacy and improving medical outcomes but have a limited focus on cost and what patients consider most valuable. If the concept of value is defined primarily by clinicians' own assumptions, there is a clear risk that the foundational premise of VBHC, to understand what outcomes patients value in their specific situation in relation to the cost to produce such outcome, will fail. Health-care leaders need to ensure that patients and the non-clinicians' perception of value, is integrated with the clinical perception, if VBHC is to deliver on its promise.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Value-Based Health Care / Leadership Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl) Journal subject: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Suecia Country of publication: Reino Unido

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Value-Based Health Care / Leadership Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl) Journal subject: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Suecia Country of publication: Reino Unido