Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Surgical management of rectal cancer with synchronous treatment of prostate cancer.
Brière, Raphaëlle; Martin, André-Guy; Letarte, François; Fournier, François Rouleau; Bouchard, Philippe; Drolet, Sébastien.
Affiliation
  • Brière R; Department of Surgery, CHU de Québec - Université Laval, 1050, Avenue de La Médecine, Quebec City, QC, Canada. raphaelle.briere.1@ulaval.ca.
  • Martin AG; Radiation Oncology Department, CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
  • Letarte F; Department of Surgery, CHU de Québec - Université Laval, 1050, Avenue de La Médecine, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
  • Fournier FR; Department of Surgery, CHU de Québec - Université Laval, 1050, Avenue de La Médecine, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
  • Bouchard P; Department of Surgery, CHU de Québec - Université Laval, 1050, Avenue de La Médecine, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
  • Drolet S; Department of Surgery, CHU de Québec - Université Laval, 1050, Avenue de La Médecine, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 409(1): 133, 2024 Apr 20.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38642125
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To assess the safety and efficacy of synchronous treatments for rectal (RC) and prostate (PC) cancers.

METHODS:

Single-center retrospective study (2007-2021) of patients treated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) and total mesorectal excision (TME) for RC with synchronous PC treatment. The endpoints were 30-day postoperative severe complications, R0 resection rates, 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 3-year overall survival (OS).

RESULTS:

Among the 16 patients, 15 (93.7%) received neoadjuvant pelvic RT (40-50.4 Gray) followed by either transperineal high dose rate prostate brachytherapy (62.5%), prostate external RT boost (25.0%), or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone (6.3%). One (6.3%) patient received neoadjuvant rectal brachytherapy and ADT. Pelvic RT was combined with chemotherapy in 87.5% of cases. TME was performed in all patients with low anterior resection (87.5%) or abdominoperineal resection (12.5%), primarily using minimally invasive surgery (87.5%). The R0 resection rate was 93.8%. Six (37.5%) patients experienced 30-day Clavien-Dindo grade IIIb complications, including one (7.1%) anastomotic leak. After a median follow-up of 39.0 months, 63.6% of diverting ileostomies were reversed. Three-year DFS from RC was 71.4% (CI 40.2-88.3) and 3-year OS was 84.4% (CI 95% 50.4-95.9). No PC recurrence or death occurred.

CONCLUSIONS:

Synchronous management of RC and PC with pelvic RT followed by curative prostate RT doses and TME showed acceptable morbidity and oncologic results. Prostate brachytherapy, the most commonly used treatment modality, allowed avoidance of prostatectomy and additional external RT to the rectum. PC should not limit the curative intent of RC, as all recurrences were from rectal origin.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prostatic Neoplasms / Rectal Neoplasms Limits: Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canadá

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prostatic Neoplasms / Rectal Neoplasms Limits: Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canadá