Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Further psychometric evaluation of the WOUND-Q: A responsiveness study.
Gallo, Lucas; Rae, Charlene; Voineskos, Sophocles; Simonsen, Nina Vestergaard; Pusic, Andrea L; Poulsen, Lotte; Sørensen, Jens Ahm; Klassen, Anne F; Cano, Stefan J.
Affiliation
  • Gallo L; Division of Plastic Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  • Rae C; Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  • Voineskos S; Division of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Simonsen NV; Department of Plastic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
  • Pusic AL; Research Unit for Plastic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
  • Poulsen L; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Sørensen JA; Department of Plastic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
  • Klassen AF; Research Unit for Plastic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
  • Cano SJ; Department of Plastic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Wound Repair Regen ; 32(4): 451-463, 2024.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38656503
ABSTRACT
The WOUND-Q is a modular patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) with 13 scales measuring constructs across 4 domains (i.e., wound characteristics, health related quality of life, experience of care and wound treatment). The psychometrics of the WOUND-Q were previously assessed and the 13 scales evidenced good validity and reliability. However, the responsiveness (i.e., ability to detect clinical change) of the WOUND-Q has yet to be assessed. The objective of this study was to evaluate responsiveness for 9 WOUND-Q scales that assess outcomes, in a sample of people 18 years of age or older with chronic wounds that were present for at least 3 months. This study conducted a 4 month follow-up of 421 participants who completed the WOUND-Q as part of a previous psychometric study. Participants completed an online survey answering questions about their current wound state (e.g., number, type, size, smell, drainage), anchor questions about change, as well as the WOUND-Q scales that they had completed in their initial assessment. Pre-defined hypotheses were tested with a 75% acceptance threshold indicating sufficient evidence of responsiveness. Minimally important differences (MIDs) were also calculated using both anchor-based and distribution-based methods. Of 390 invited participants, 320 provided responses, ranging in age from 19 to 84 years. Acceptance of hypotheses ranged from 60% to 100%, with only the Symptom scale not meeting the 75% threshold. The findings of this study provide evidence that the WOUND-Q can validly measure clinical change in patients with chronic wounds.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Psychometrics / Quality of Life / Wound Healing / Wounds and Injuries / Patient Reported Outcome Measures Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Wound Repair Regen Journal subject: DERMATOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canadá

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Psychometrics / Quality of Life / Wound Healing / Wounds and Injuries / Patient Reported Outcome Measures Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Wound Repair Regen Journal subject: DERMATOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canadá