Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of a machine learning algorithm to identify pulmonary vein isolation during ablation procedures for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: results of the PVISION study.
De Pooter, Jan; Timmers, Liesbeth; Boveda, Serge; Combes, Stephane; Knecht, Sebastien; Almorad, Alexandre; De Asmundis, Carlos; Duytschaever, Mattias.
Affiliation
  • De Pooter J; Heart Center, UZ Ghent, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
  • Timmers L; Heart Center, UZ Ghent, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
  • Boveda S; Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France.
  • Combes S; Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France.
  • Knecht S; AZ Sint-Jan, Brugge, Belgium.
  • Almorad A; UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
  • De Asmundis C; UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Duytschaever M; AZ Sint-Jan, Brugge, Belgium.
Europace ; 26(5)2024 May 02.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38682165
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of ablation for atrial fibrillation. Confirmation of PVI can be challenging due to the presence of far-field electrograms (EGMs) and sometimes requires additional pacing manoeuvres or mapping. This prospective multicentre study assessed the agreement between a previously trained automated algorithm designed to determine vein isolation status with expert opinion in a real-world clinical setting. METHODS AND

RESULTS:

Consecutive patients scheduled for PVI were recruited at four centres. The ECGenius electrophysiology (EP) recording system (CathVision ApS, Copenhagen, Denmark) was connected in parallel with the existing system in the laboratory. Electrograms from a circular mapping catheter were annotated during sinus rhythm at baseline pre-ablation, time of isolation, and post-ablation. The ground truth for isolation status was based on operator opinion. The algorithm was applied to the collected PV signals off-line and compared with expert opinion. The primary endpoint was a sensitivity and specificity exceeding 80%. Overall, 498 EGMs (248 at baseline and 250 at PVI) with 5473 individual PV beats from 89 patients (32 females, 62 ± 12 years) were analysed. The algorithm performance reached an area under the curve (AUC) of 92% and met the primary study endpoint with a sensitivity and specificity of 86 and 87%, respectively (P = 0.005; P = 0.004). The algorithm had an accuracy rate of 87% in classifying the time of isolation.

CONCLUSION:

This study validated an automated algorithm using machine learning to assess the isolation status of pulmonary veins in patients undergoing PVI with different ablation modalities. The algorithm reached an AUC of 92%, with both sensitivity and specificity exceeding the primary study endpoints.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pulmonary Veins / Atrial Fibrillation / Catheter Ablation / Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac / Machine Learning Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Europace Journal subject: CARDIOLOGIA / FISIOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Bélgica Country of publication: Reino Unido

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pulmonary Veins / Atrial Fibrillation / Catheter Ablation / Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac / Machine Learning Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Europace Journal subject: CARDIOLOGIA / FISIOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Bélgica Country of publication: Reino Unido