Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Association of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Postoperative Outcomes in Immediate Prepectoral Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction.
Choi, Jae-Min; Lee, Jong-Koo; Pyon, Jai-Kyong; Mun, Goo-Hyun; Jeon, Byung-Joon; Lee, Kyeong-Tae.
Affiliation
  • Choi JM; From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Myong-Ji Hospital, Myong-Ji Medical Foundation, Goyang.
  • Lee JK; Department of Plastic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Pyon JK; Department of Plastic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Mun GH; Department of Plastic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Jeon BJ; Department of Plastic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Lee KT; Department of Plastic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Ann Plast Surg ; 92(5): 514-521, 2024 May 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38685491
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by total mastectomy and immediate reconstruction has become an important strategy in the treatment of breast cancer. Although the safety of subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction with NACT has been extensively evaluated, the safety in prepectoral reconstruction has not been clearly elucidated. We aimed to evaluate the association of NACT with immediate prepectoral breast reconstruction outcomes.

METHODS:

A retrospective review of patients who underwent total mastectomy and immediate implant-based prepectoral breast reconstruction between May and December 2021 was conducted. Patients were categorized into 2 groups those receiving NACT and those not receiving it. Postoperative complication rates were compared between the 2 groups. The independent association between NACT and the complication profiles was evaluated. Propensity score matching was also conducted.

RESULTS:

We analyzed 343 cases, including 85 who received NACT treatment and 258 who did not. Compared with the non-NACT group, the NACT group was younger, had a higher body mass index, and a higher rate of adjuvant radiotherapy. There were no differences in the rates of overall complications or type of complication between the 2 groups. In the multivariable logistic analyses, NACT did not show a significant association with the development of adverse outcomes. Similar results were observed in propensity score matching analyses.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our results suggest that receiving NACT may not have a significant detrimental effect on the postoperative outcomes of immediate prepectoral prosthetic reconstructions. Conducting prepectoral implant-based reconstruction in the setting of NACT might be safe and provide acceptable outcomes.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Postoperative Complications / Breast Neoplasms / Neoadjuvant Therapy Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Ann Plast Surg Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: Estados Unidos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Postoperative Complications / Breast Neoplasms / Neoadjuvant Therapy Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Ann Plast Surg Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: Estados Unidos