Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Aerosol drug therapy in critically ill patients (Aero-in-ICU study): A multicentre prospective observational cohort study.
Singhal, Sanjay; Gurjar, Mohan; Sahoo, Jyoti Narayan; Saran, Sai; Dua, Ruchi; Sahoo, Alok Kumar; Sharma, Ankur; Agarwal, Sonika; Sharma, Arun; Ghosh, Pralay Shankar; Rao, Parnandi Bhaskar; Kothari, Nikhil; Joshi, Krupal; Deokar, Kunal; Mukherjee, Sudipta; Sharma, Prakhar; Sreedevi, Billa Ps; Sivaramakrishnan, Prakash; Singh, Umadri; Sundaram, Dhivya; Agrawal, Avinash; Katoch, Chandan Dev Singh.
Affiliation
  • Singhal S; Pulmonary Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Science, Rajkot, Gujarat, India.
  • Gurjar M; Critical Care Medicine, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
  • Sahoo JN; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Apollo Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
  • Saran S; Critical Care Medicine, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
  • Dua R; Pulmonary Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
  • Sahoo AK; Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
  • Sharma A; Trauma and Emergency (Anaesthesia and Critical Care), AIIMS Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
  • Agarwal S; Critical Care Medicine, HIMS, SRHU, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
  • Sharma A; Critical Care Medicine, RBH, India.
  • Ghosh PS; Critical Care Medicine, Tata Medical Center, India.
  • Rao PB; Anesthesiology and Critical Care, AIIMS, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
  • Kothari N; Anaesthesia and Critical Care, AIIMS Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
  • Joshi K; Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rajkot, Gujarat, India.
  • Deokar K; Pulmonary Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Science, Rajkot, Gujarat, India.
  • Mukherjee S; Critical Care Medicine, Tata Medical Center, India.
  • Sharma P; Pulmonary Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
  • Sreedevi BP; Critical Care Medicine, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
  • Sivaramakrishnan P; Pulmonary Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
  • Singh U; Critical Care Medicine, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
  • Sundaram D; Anaesthesia and Critical Care, AIIMS Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
  • Agrawal A; Critical Care Medicine, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
  • Katoch CDS; Pulmonary Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Science, Rajkot, Gujarat, India.
Lung India ; 41(3): 200-208, 2024 May 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38687231
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In recent years, a significant understanding of delivering optimal aerosol therapy and the availability of various drugs and devices have led to an increase in its use in clinical practice. There are only a few studies available regarding their use in critically ill patients from a few parts of the world. We aimed to study the practice pattern of aerosol therapy in critically ill patients from Indian intensive care units (ICUs).

METHODS:

After ethical approval, this multi-centric prospective observational study was performed over a study period of four weeks. Newly admitted adult patients considered who had an artificial airway and/or ventilation (including non-invasive). Patients were followed up for the next 14 days or until ICU discharge/death (whichever came first) for details of each aerosol therapy, including ongoing respiratory support, drug type, and aerosol-generating device.

RESULTS:

From the nine participating centers across India, 218 patients were enrolled. Of 218 enrolled patients, 72.48% received 4884 aerosols with 30.91 ± 27.15 (95%CI 26.6-35.1) aerosols per patient over 1108 patient days. Approximately 62.7% during IMV, 30.2% during NIV, 2.3% in spontaneously breathing patients with an artificial airway during weaning, and 4.7% were given without an artificial airway after weaning or decannulation. In 59%, a single drug was used, and bronchodilators were the most frequent. The jet nebulizer was the most common, followed by the ultrasonic and vibrating mesh aerosol generator. The ventilator setting was changed in only 6.6% of the aerosol sessions with IMV and none with NIV.

CONCLUSION:

Aerosol therapy is frequently used with a wide variation in practices; bronchodilators are the most commonly used drugs, and jet nebulizers are the most widely used.

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Lung India Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: India

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Lung India Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: India
...