Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Participants with restricted dominant shoulder internal rotation range of motion demonstrate no side-to-side difference in humeral head translation; and no difference before and after joint mobilization: a pilot study.
Hoops, John F; Hooper, Troy L; Sobczak, Stéphane; Kapila, Jeegisha; Dewan, Birendra M; Matthijs, Omer C; Brismée, Jean-Michel.
Affiliation
  • Hoops JF; Northern Arizona University: 208 E Pine Knoll Drive, Flagstaff, AZ, 86001, USA.
  • Hooper TL; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Center for Rehabilitation Research, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, USA.
  • Sobczak S; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Center for Rehabilitation Research, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, USA.
  • Kapila J; Chaire de Recherche en Anatomie Fonctionnelle, Groupe de Recherche Sur Les Affections Neuromusculosquelettiques, Département d'Anatomie, Université Du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Canada.
  • Dewan BM; Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health Professions, University of North Texas, Health Science Center at Fort Worth, USA.
  • Matthijs OC; Department of Physical Therapy, Long Island University, USA.
  • Brismée JM; International Academy of Orthopedic Medicine, Germany.
J Phys Ther Sci ; 36(5): 259-266, 2024 May.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38694012
ABSTRACT
[Purpose] To compare humeral head translation (HHT) during shoulder elevation between dominant and non-dominant shoulders in participants with limited dominant shoulder internal rotation range of motion (ROM). To determine if joint mobilization alters HHT, and if relationships exist between the bicipital forearm angle and HHT. [Participants and Methods] Fifteen (9 female) participants (age 25.7 ± 6.8 years) with a minimum 15-degree dominant shoulder internal rotation ROM deficit compared to the opposite shoulder participated. All participants underwent bicipital forearm angle (BFA) measurements and ultrasound imaging to measure acromiohumeral and posterior glenohumeral distances in 3 positions Resting, 90 degrees of shoulder flexion, and 60 degrees of shoulder abduction with full external rotation. Ultrasound images were used to calculate HHT. Participants' dominant shoulders underwent posterior glide mobilization, followed immediately by repeated ultrasound images and ROM measures. [Results] There was no dominant to non-dominant shoulder, or before and after mobilization HHT differences. No correlations existed between bicipital forearm angles and HHT or ROM gains after mobilization. [Conclusion] Participants with internal rotation ROM loss demonstrated symmetrical HHT. Joint mobilization increased ROM, but HHT was unchanged. No relationships existed between BFA and HHT.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Phys Ther Sci Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Phys Ther Sci Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos
...