Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Beneath the surface: A systematic review on intraoperative imaging techniques for deep margin assessment in oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Adriaansens, C M E M; de Koning, K J; van Es, R J J; de Bree, R; Noorlag, Rob.
Affiliation
  • Adriaansens CMEM; Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, the Netherlands. Electronic address: c.m.e.m.adriaansens-2@umcutrecht.nl.
  • de Koning KJ; Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, the Netherlands. Electronic address: K.J.deKoning@umcutrecht.nl.
  • van Es RJJ; Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • de Bree R; Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Noorlag R; Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Oral Oncol ; 153: 106823, 2024 Jun.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38701572
ABSTRACT
Resection margins of oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) are often inadequate. A systematic review on clinical intraoperative whole-specimen imaging techniques to obtain adequate deep resection margins in oral SCC is lacking. Such a review may render better alternatives for the current insufficient intraoperative techniques palpation and frozen section analyses (FSA). This review resulted in ten publications investigating ultrasound (US), four investigating fluorescence, and three investigating MRI. Both US and fluorescence were able to image the tumor intraorally and perform ex-vivo imaging of the resection specimen. Fluorescence was also able to image residual tumor tissue in the wound bed. MRI could only be used on the ex-vivo specimen. The 95 % confidence intervals for sensitivity and specificity were large, due to the small sample sizes for all three techniques. The sensitivity and specificity of US for identifying < 5 mm margins ranged from 0 % to 100 % and 60 % to 100 %, respectively. For fluorescence, this ranged from 0 % to 100 % and 76 % to 100 %, respectively. For MRI, this ranged from 7 % to 100 % and 81 % to 100 %, respectively. US, MRI and fluorescence are the currently available imaging techniques that can potentially be used intraoperatively and which can image the entire tumor-free margin, although they have insufficient sensitivity for identifying < 5 mm margins. Further research on larger cohorts is needed to improve the sensitivity by determining cut-off points on imaging for inadequate margins. This improves the number of adequate resections of oral SCC's and pave the way for routine clinical implementation of these techniques.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Mouth Neoplasms / Carcinoma, Squamous Cell / Margins of Excision Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Oral Oncol / Oral oncol / Oral oncology Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: Reino Unido

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Mouth Neoplasms / Carcinoma, Squamous Cell / Margins of Excision Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Oral Oncol / Oral oncol / Oral oncology Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: Reino Unido