Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Merging Photorefractive Keratectomy and Collagen Crosslinking: An Analysis of Literature and a Guide to Prevalent Protocols.
Moshirfar, Majid; Rognon, Gregory T; Olson, Nate; Kay, Walker; Sperry, R Alek; Ha, Seungyeon; Hoopes, Phillip C.
Affiliation
  • Moshirfar M; Corneal and Refractive Surgery, HDR Vision Research Center, Hoopes Vision, Draper, UT.
  • Rognon GT; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT.
  • Olson N; Corneal Transplantation and Eye Banking, Utah Lions Eye Bank, Murray, UT.
  • Kay W; Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University, North Chicago, IL.
  • Sperry RA; College of Osteopathic Medicine, Rocky Vista University, Ivins, UT.
  • Ha S; Noorda College of Medicine, Provo, UT.
  • Hoopes PC; School of Medicine, Texas A&M University, Bryan, TX.
Cornea ; 43(9): 1184-1197, 2024 Sep 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38759151
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this review was to summarize the different surgical approaches combining photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and corneal crosslinking (CXL), present each protocol template in a simple format, and provide an overview of the primary outcomes and adverse events.

METHODS:

A literature review was conducted as outlined by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Eight different databases were searched. Papers were included if PRK was immediately followed by CXL.

RESULTS:

Thirty-seven papers met the inclusion criteria of a total yield of 823. The latest research into simultaneous PRK and CXL has been shown to not only stabilize the cornea and prevent keratoconus progression but also improve the visual acuity of the patient. Improvements in uncorrected distance visual acuity and (spectacle) corrected distance visual acuity were found to be significant when considering all protocols. There were also significant reductions in K1, K2, mean K, Kmax, sphere, cylinder, and spherical equivalent. Random-effects analysis confirmed these trends. Corrected distance visual acuity was found to improve by an average of 0.18 ± 1.49 logMAR (Cohen's D [CD] 0.12; P <0.02). There was also a significant reduction of 2.57 ± 0.45 D (CD 5.74; P <0.001) in Kmax. Cylinder and spherical equivalent were also reduced by 1.36 ± 0.26 D (CD 5.25; P <0.001) and 2.61 ± 0.38 D (CD 6.73; P <0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

Combining the 2 procedures appears to be of net benefit, showing stabilization and improvement of ectatic disease, while also providing modest gains in visual acuity. Since customized PRK and CXL approaches appear superior, a combination of these would likely be best for patients.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Photochemotherapy / Riboflavin / Ultraviolet Rays / Visual Acuity / Collagen / Photosensitizing Agents / Photorefractive Keratectomy / Cross-Linking Reagents / Keratoconus Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Cornea Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: Estados Unidos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Photochemotherapy / Riboflavin / Ultraviolet Rays / Visual Acuity / Collagen / Photosensitizing Agents / Photorefractive Keratectomy / Cross-Linking Reagents / Keratoconus Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Cornea Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: Estados Unidos