Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Qualitative analysis of the factors associated with whistleblowing intentions among athletes from six European countries.
Toner, John; Jones, Luke; Fairs, Lucas; Mantis, Constantine; Barkoukis, Vassilis; Daroglou, Garyfallia; Perry, John L; Micle, Andrei V; Theodorou, Nikolaos C; Shakhverdieva, Sabina; Stoicescu, Marius; Pompiliu-Nicolae, Constantin; Vesic, Milica V; Dikic, Nenad; Andjelkovic, Marija; Revilla, Jesús Muñoz-Guerra; García-Grimau, Elena; Martínez, Miguel A E; Amigo, Javier A; Schomöller, Anne; Nicholls, Adam Robert.
Affiliation
  • Toner J; School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom.
  • Jones L; Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
  • Fairs L; School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom.
  • Mantis C; School of Social Sciences, Humanities & Law, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.
  • Barkoukis V; Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
  • Daroglou G; Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
  • Perry JL; Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
  • Micle AV; Romanian National Anti-Doping Agency, Bucharest, Romania.
  • Theodorou NC; Independent Researcher, Athens, Greece.
  • Shakhverdieva S; Independent Researcher, Athens, Greece.
  • Stoicescu M; Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, National University of Physical Education and Sport, Bucharest, Romania.
  • Pompiliu-Nicolae C; Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, National University of Physical Education and Sport, Bucharest, Romania.
  • Vesic MV; Anti-doping Agency of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
  • Dikic N; Anti-doping Agency of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
  • Andjelkovic M; Sports Medicine Associations of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
  • Revilla JM; Anti-doping Agency of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
  • García-Grimau E; Comisión Española para la Lucha Antidopaje en el Deporte (CELAD), Spain.
  • Martínez MAE; Comisión Española para la Lucha Antidopaje en el Deporte (CELAD), Spain.
  • Amigo JA; Comisión Española para la Lucha Antidopaje en el Deporte (CELAD), Spain.
  • Schomöller A; Comisión Española para la Lucha Antidopaje en el Deporte (CELAD), Spain.
  • Nicholls AR; International Council of Sport Science and Physical Education, Berlin, Germany.
Front Sports Act Living ; 6: 1335258, 2024.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38774279
ABSTRACT
Although whistleblowing is thought to represent an effective mechanism for detecting and uncovering doping in sport, it has yet to become a widely adopted practice. Understanding the factors that encourage or discourage whistleblowing is of vital importance for the promotion of this practice and the development of pedagogical material to enhance the likelihood of whistleblowing. The current study employed a qualitative methodology to explore the personal and organisational factors that underpin intentions to blow the whistle or that may lead to engagement in whistleblowing behaviours in sport. Thirty-three competitive athletes across a range of sports took part in a semi-structured interview which sought to explore what they would do should they encounter a doping scenario. Content analysis revealed that whistleblowing is a dynamic process characterised by the interaction of a range of personal and organisational factors in determining the intention to report PED use. These factors included moral reasoning, a desire to keep the matter "in-house", perceived personal costs, institutional attitudes to doping, and social support. Analysis revealed a number of "intervening events", including a perceived lack of organisational protection (e.g., ethical leadership) within some sporting sub-cultures, which present an important obstacle to whistleblowing. The intention to report doping was underpinned by a "fairness-loyalty trade-off" which involved athletes choosing to adhere to either fairness norms (which relate to a sense that all people and groups are treated equally) or loyalty norms (which reflect preferential treatment towards an in-group) when deciding whether they would blow the whistle. The promotion of fairness norms that emphasise a group's collective interests might encourage athletes to view whistleblowing as a means of increasing group cohesiveness and effectiveness and thereby increase the likelihood of this practice.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Front Sports Act Living Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Reino Unido

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Front Sports Act Living Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Reino Unido