Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Systematic Review of Loco-Sedative Anesthesia for Urologic Surgery.
Panchendrabose, Kapilan; Bal, Dhiraj S; Sidhom, Karim; Chung, David; Pierce, Andrew; Lokeshwar, Soum; Patel, Premal.
Affiliation
  • Panchendrabose K; Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
  • Bal DS; Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
  • Sidhom K; Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
  • Chung D; Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
  • Pierce A; Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
  • Lokeshwar S; Department of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
  • Patel P; Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. Electronic address: ppatel5@hsc.mb.ca.
Urology ; 189: 1-8, 2024 Jul.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38777190
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To perform a systematic review of the characteristics and outcomes of conscious sedation and local anesthesia for various urologic procedures. Urologic care has much to gain from the routine integration of ambulatory surgery via loco-sedative anesthetic techniques for both surgeon and patient.

METHODS:

A comprehensive systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, and Scopus databases following PRISMA criteria from June to August 2021. Articles were included if they were English, prospective, randomized, or nonrandomized controlled trials that used local anesthetic or conscious sedation for urologic interventions in adult patients. Additionally, included studies provided primary data on the use loco-sedative anesthesia and the efficacy and complications. All studies included were further reviewed to assess the biases and conflicts of interests.

RESULTS:

Thirty-two studies with 6897 patients were included in the review. Mean patient age was 46.4years. The most common anesthetic and analgesic relief was the use of local anesthetic with 1% lidocaine. The majority used lidocaine as an injection, whereas the second most common route of administration was a topical cream. However, there was significant heterogeneity in the type of local or conscious sedation method and whether a combination was used. 44.4% of the studies used the visual analog scale as their primary endpoint. All the studies reported an 83%-100% successful procedure rate without note of significant sedation-related complications.

CONCLUSION:

Given the high efficacy rates, loco-sedative anesthesia is a promising technique for urologic interventions and should be further investigated to determine whether it may become be the standard of care.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Urologic Surgical Procedures / Conscious Sedation / Anesthesia, Local / Anesthetics, Local Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Urology Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canadá Country of publication: Estados Unidos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Urologic Surgical Procedures / Conscious Sedation / Anesthesia, Local / Anesthetics, Local Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Urology Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canadá Country of publication: Estados Unidos