Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effects of vitamin D supplementation on a deep learning-based mammographic evaluation in SWOG S0812.
McGuinness, Julia E; Anderson, Garnet L; Mutasa, Simukayi; Hershman, Dawn L; Terry, Mary Beth; Tehranifar, Parisa; Lew, Danika L; Yee, Monica; Brown, Eric A; Kairouz, Sebastien S; Kuwajerwala, Nafisa; Bevers, Therese B; Doster, John E; Zarwan, Corrine; Kruper, Laura; Minasian, Lori M; Ford, Leslie; Arun, Banu; Neuhouser, Marian L; Goodman, Gary E; Brown, Powel H; Ha, Richard; Crew, Katherine D.
Affiliation
  • McGuinness JE; Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and the Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Anderson GL; Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Mutasa S; SWOG Cancer Research Network, Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Hershman DL; Department of Radiology, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
  • Terry MB; Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and the Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Tehranifar P; Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and the Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Lew DL; Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and the Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Yee M; SWOG Cancer Research Network, Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Brown EA; SWOG Cancer Research Network, Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Kairouz SS; William Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program, Troy, MI, USA.
  • Kuwajerwala N; Cancer Care Specialists of Central Illinois, Heartland National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program, Decatur, IL, USA.
  • Bevers TB; William Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program, Troy, MI, USA.
  • Doster JE; Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Zarwan C; Anderson Area Cancer Center, Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program, Anderson, SC, USA.
  • Kruper L; Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA, USA.
  • Minasian LM; Department of Breast Oncology, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
  • Ford L; Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Arun B; Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Neuhouser ML; Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Goodman GE; Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Brown PH; Swedish Cancer Institute, Pacific Cancer Research Consortium National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Ha R; Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Crew KD; Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and the Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
JNCI Cancer Spectr ; 8(4)2024 Jul 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38814817
ABSTRACT
Deep learning-based mammographic evaluations could noninvasively assess response to breast cancer chemoprevention. We evaluated change in a convolutional neural network-based breast cancer risk model applied to mammograms among women enrolled in SWOG S0812, which randomly assigned 208 premenopausal high-risk women to receive oral vitamin D3 20 000 IU weekly or placebo for 12 months. We applied the convolutional neural network model to mammograms collected at baseline (n = 109), 12 months (n = 97), and 24 months (n = 67) and compared changes in convolutional neural network-based risk score between treatment groups. Change in convolutional neural network-based risk score was not statistically significantly different between vitamin D and placebo groups at 12 months (0.005 vs 0.002, P = .875) or at 24 months (0.020 vs 0.001, P = .563). The findings are consistent with the primary analysis of S0812, which did not demonstrate statistically significant changes in mammographic density with vitamin D supplementation compared with placebo. There is an ongoing need to evaluate biomarkers of response to novel breast cancer chemopreventive agents.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Breast Neoplasms / Mammography / Cholecalciferol / Dietary Supplements / Breast Density / Deep Learning Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Language: En Journal: JNCI Cancer Spectr Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Breast Neoplasms / Mammography / Cholecalciferol / Dietary Supplements / Breast Density / Deep Learning Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Language: En Journal: JNCI Cancer Spectr Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos