Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Fiscal space for the immunisation program in Zambia- an efficiency analysis approach.
Chompolola, Abson; Chama-Chiliba, Chitalu Miriam; Simuyemba, Moses Chikoti; Sinyangwe, Aaron Chisha; Bchir, Abdallah; Asiimwe, Gilbert; Masiye, Felix.
Affiliation
  • Chompolola A; Department of Economics, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zambia, Lusaka, PO Box 32379, Zambia. absonchompolola@yahoo.co.uk.
  • Chama-Chiliba CM; Institute of Economic and Social Research, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
  • Simuyemba MC; School of Public Health, Department of Community and Family Medicine, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
  • Sinyangwe AC; Department of Economics, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zambia, Lusaka, PO Box 32379, Zambia.
  • Bchir A; University of Monastir, Monastir Medical School, Tunis, Tunisia.
  • Asiimwe G; Monitoring and Evaluation Department, Gavi-The Vaccine Alliance, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Masiye F; Department of Economics, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zambia, Lusaka, PO Box 32379, Zambia.
BMC Res Notes ; 17(1): 152, 2024 Jun 03.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38831445
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The immunisation programme in Zambia remains one of the most effective public health programmes. Its financial sustainability is, however, uncertain. Using administrative data on immunisation coverage rate, vaccine utilisation, the number of health facilities and human resources, expenditure on health promotion, and the provision of outreach services from 24 districts, we used Data Envelopment Analysis to determine the level of technical efficiency in the provision of immunisation services. Based on our calculated levels of technical efficiency, we determined the available fiscal space for immunisation.

RESULTS:

Out of the 24 districts in our sample, 9 (38%) were technically inefficient in the provision of immunisation services. The average efficiency score, however, was quite high, at 0.92 (CRS technology) and 0.95 (VRS technology). Based on the calculated level of technical efficiency, we estimated that an improvement in technical efficiency can save enough vaccine doses to supply between 5 and 14 additional districts. The challenge, however, lies in identifying and correcting for the sources of technical inefficiency.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Immunization Programs Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Africa Language: En Journal: BMC Res Notes Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Zambia Country of publication: Reino Unido

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Immunization Programs Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Africa Language: En Journal: BMC Res Notes Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Zambia Country of publication: Reino Unido