Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Growth modulation response in vertebral body tethering depends primarily on magnitude of concave vertebral body growth.
Louer, Craig R; Upasani, Vidyadhar V; Hurry, Jennifer K; Nian, Hui; Farnsworth, Christine L; Newton, Peter O; Parent, Stefan; El-Hawary, Ron.
Affiliation
  • Louer CR; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2200 Childrens Way, Suite 4202, Nashville, TN, 37212, USA. Craig.louer@vumc.org.
  • Upasani VV; Department of Orthopedics, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, CA, USA.
  • Hurry JK; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
  • Nian H; Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada.
  • Farnsworth CL; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2200 Childrens Way, Suite 4202, Nashville, TN, 37212, USA.
  • Newton PO; Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Parent S; Department of Orthopedics, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, CA, USA.
  • El-Hawary R; Department of Orthopedics, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, CA, USA.
Spine Deform ; 2024 Jun 04.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38834863
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

There is variability in clinical outcomes with vertebral body tethering (VBT) partly due to a limited understanding of the growth modulation (GM) response. We used the largest sample of patients with 3D spine reconstructions to characterize the vertebra and disc morphologic changes that accompany growth modulation during the first two years following VBT.

METHODS:

A multicenter registry was used to identify idiopathic scoliosis patients who underwent VBT with 2 years of follow-up. Calibrated biplanar X-rays obtained at longitudinal timepoints underwent 3D reconstruction to obtain precision morphological measurements. GM was defined as change in instrumented coronal angulation from post-op to 2-years.

RESULTS:

Fifty patients (mean age 12.5 ± 1.3yrs) were analyzed over a mean of 27.7 months. GM was positively correlated with concave vertebra height growth (r = 0.57, p < 0.001), 3D spine length growth (r = 0.36, p = 0.008), and decreased convex disc height (r = - 0.42, p = 0.002). High modulators (patients experiencing GM > 10°) experienced an additional 1.6 mm (229% increase) of mean concave vertebra growth during study period compared to the Poor Modulators (GM < - 10°) group, (2.3 vs. 0.7 mm, p = 0.039), while convex vertebra height growth was similar (1.3 vs. 1.4 mm, p = 0.91).

CONCLUSION:

When successful, VBT enables asymmetric vertebra body growth, leading to continued postoperative coronal angulation correction (GM). A strong GM response is correlated with concave vertebral body height growth and overall instrumented spine growth. A poor GM response is associated with an increase in convex disc height (suspected tether rupture). Future studies will investigate the patient and technique-specific factors that influence increased growth remodeling.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Spine Deform Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Spine Deform Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos