Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A mixed-methods descriptive study on the role of continuous quality improvement in rural surgical and obstetrical stability: Considering enablers, challenges and impact.
Kornelsen, Jude; Cameron, Audrey; Stoll, Kathrin; Skinner, Tom; Humber, Nancy; Williams, Kim; Ebert, Sean.
Affiliation
  • Kornelsen J; Centre for Rural Health Research, Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Cameron A; Centre for Rural Health Research, Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Stoll K; Centre for Rural Health Research, Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Skinner T; Rural Coordination Centre of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Humber N; Rural Coordination Centre of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Williams K; Rural Coordination Centre of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Ebert S; Rural Coordination Centre of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
PLoS One ; 19(6): e0300977, 2024.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38843178
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The Rural Surgical Obstetrical Networks (RSON) initiative in BC was developed to stabilize and grow low volume rural surgical and obstetrical services. One of the wrap-around supportive interventions was funding for Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) initiatives, done through a local provider-driven lens. This paper reviews mixed-methods findings on providers' experiences with CQI and the implications for service stability.

BACKGROUND:

Small, rural hospitals face barriers in implementing quality improvement initiatives due primarily to lack of resource capacity and the need to prioritize clinical care when allocating limited health human resources. Given this, funding and resources for CQI were key enablers of the RSON initiative and seen as an essential part of a response to assuaging concerns of specialists at higher volume sites regarding quality in lower volume settings.

METHODS:

Data were derived from two datasets in-depth, qualitative interviews with rural health care providers and administrators over the course of the RSON initiative and through a survey administered at RSON sites in 2023.

FINDINGS:

Qualitative findings revealed participants' perceptions of the value of CQI (including developing expanded skillsets and improved team function and culture), enablers (the organizational infrastructure for CQI projects), challenges in implementation (complications in protecting/prioritizing CQI time and difficulty with staff engagement) and the importance of local leadership. Survey findings showed high ratings for elements of team function that relate directly to CQI (team process and relationships).

CONCLUSION:

Attention to effective mechanisms of CQI through a rural lens is essential to ensure that initiatives meet the contextual realities of low-volume sites. Instituting pathways for locally-driven quality improvement initiatives enhances team function at rural hospitals through creating opportunities for trust building and goal setting, improving communication and increasing individual and team-wide motivation to improve patient care.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Hospitals, Rural / Rural Health Services / Quality Improvement Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canadá Country of publication: Estados Unidos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Hospitals, Rural / Rural Health Services / Quality Improvement Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canadá Country of publication: Estados Unidos