Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Utility of shaking chills as a diagnostic sign for bacteremia in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Aita, Tetsuro; Nakagawa, Hiroaki; Takahashi, Sei; Naganuma, Toru; Anan, Keisuke; Banno, Masahiro; Hamaguchi, Sugihiro.
Affiliation
  • Aita T; Department of General Internal Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima City, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima, 960-1295, Japan. gstetsuro@gmail.com.
  • Nakagawa H; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan. gstetsuro@gmail.com.
  • Takahashi S; Department of General Internal Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima City, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima, 960-1295, Japan.
  • Naganuma T; Department of General Internal Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima City, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima, 960-1295, Japan.
  • Anan K; Futaba Emergency and General Medicine Support Center, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
  • Banno M; Department of General Internal Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima City, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima, 960-1295, Japan.
  • Hamaguchi S; Futaba Emergency and General Medicine Support Center, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
BMC Med ; 22(1): 240, 2024 Jun 11.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38863066
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Accurate prediction of bacteremia is essential for guiding blood culture collection and optimal antibiotic treatment. Shaking chills, defined as a subjective chill sensation with objective body shivering, have been suggested as a potential predictor of bacteremia; however, conflicting findings exist. To address the evidence gap, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies to assess the diagnostic accuracy of shaking chills for predicting bacteremia among adult patients.

METHODS:

We included studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of shaking chills or chills for bacteremia. Adult patients with suspected bacteremia who underwent at least one set of blood cultures were included. Our main analysis focused on studies that assessed shaking chills. We searched these studies through CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, the World Health Organization ICTRP Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Study selection, data extraction, evaluation for risk of bias, and applicability using the QUADAS-2 tool were conducted by two independent investigators. We estimated a summary receiver operating characteristic curve and a summary point of sensitivity and specificity of the index tests, using a hierarchical model and the bivariate model, respectively.

RESULTS:

We identified 19 studies with a total of 14,641 patients in which the accuracy of shaking chills was evaluated. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of shaking chills were 0.37 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29 to 0.45) and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.83 to 0.90), respectively. Most studies had a low risk of bias in the index test domain and a high risk of bias and a high applicability concern in the patient-selection domain.

CONCLUSIONS:

Shaking chills are a highly specific but less sensitive predictor of bacteremia. Blood cultures and early initiation of antibiotics should be considered for patients with an episode of shaking chills; however, the absence of shaking chills must not lead to exclusion of bacteremia and early antibiotic treatment.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Bacteremia / Chills Limits: Adult / Humans Language: En Journal: BMC Med Journal subject: MEDICINA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Japón

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Bacteremia / Chills Limits: Adult / Humans Language: En Journal: BMC Med Journal subject: MEDICINA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Japón