Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Trust your gut: Establishing confidence in gastrointestinal models - An overview of the state of the science and contexts of use.
Debad, Susan; Allen, David; Bandele, Omari; Bishop, Colin; Blaylock, Michaela; Brown, Paul; Bunger, Maureen K; Co, Julia Y; Crosby, Lynn; Daniel, Amber B; Ferguson, Steve S; Ford, Kevin; Gamboa da Costa, Gonçalo; Gilchrist, Kristin H; Grogg, Matthew W; Gwinn, Maureen; Hartung, Thomas; Hogan, Simon P; Jeong, Ye Eun; Kass, George En; Kenyon, Elaina; Kleinstreuer, Nicole C; Kujala, Ville; Lundquist, Patrik; Matheson, Joanna; McCullough, Shaun D; Melton-Celsa, Angela; Musser, Steven; Oh, Ilung; Oyetade, Oluwakemi B; Patil, Sarita U; Petersen, Elijah J; Sadrieh, Nakissa; Sayes, Christie M; Scruggs, Benjamin S; Tan, Yu-Mei; Thelin, Bill; Nelson, M Tyler; Tarazona, José V; Wambaugh, John F; Yang, Jun-Young; Yu, Changwoo; Fitzpatrick, Suzanne.
Affiliation
  • Debad S; SJD Consulting LLC, Ijamsville, MD, USA.
  • Allen D; Inotiv, Inc., RTP, NC, USA.
  • Bandele O; Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, College Park, MD, USA.
  • Bishop C; Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA.
  • Blaylock M; Inotiv, Inc., RTP, NC, USA.
  • Brown P; Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
  • Bunger MK; Altis Biosystems, Inc. Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
  • Co JY; Complex in vitro Systems, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Crosby L; Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, College Park, MD, USA.
  • Daniel AB; Inotiv, Inc., RTP, NC, USA.
  • Ferguson SS; Mechanistic Toxicology Branch, Division of Translational Toxicology, NIEHS, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Ford K; Office of Clinical Pharmacology, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
  • Gamboa da Costa G; FDA National Center for Toxicological Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, AR, USA.
  • Gilchrist KH; 4D Bio³ Center for Biotechnology, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Grogg MW; 711th Human Performance Wing, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, USA.
  • Gwinn M; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, RTP, NC, USA.
  • Hartung T; Johns Hopkins University, Bloomberg School of Public Health and Whiting School of Engineering, Doerenkamp-Zbinden-Chair for Evidence-based Toxicology, Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Hogan SP; University of Konstanz, CAAT-Europe, Konstanz, Germany.
  • Jeong YE; Mary H. Weiser Food Allergy Center, Department of Pathology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Kass GE; Division of Applied Regulatory Science, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
  • Kenyon E; European Food Safety Authority, Parma, Italy.
  • Kleinstreuer NC; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, RTP, NC, USA.
  • Kujala V; NIEHS/NICEATM, RTP, NC, USA.
  • Lundquist P; Emulate Inc., Boston, MA, USA.
  • Matheson J; Department of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • McCullough SD; U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Rockville, MD, USA.
  • Melton-Celsa A; Exposure and Protection, RTI International, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Musser S; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Oh I; Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, College Park, MD, USA.
  • Oyetade OB; Toxicology Research Division, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Republic of Korea.
  • Patil SU; Inotiv, Inc., RTP, NC, USA.
  • Petersen EJ; Divisions of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Sadrieh N; Biosystems and Biomaterials Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
  • Sayes CM; Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, College Park, MD, USA.
  • Scruggs BS; Department of Environmental Science, Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA.
  • Tan YM; Altis Biosystems, Inc. Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
  • Thelin B; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
  • Nelson MT; Altis Biosystems, Inc. Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
  • Tarazona JV; 711th Human Performance Wing, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, USA.
  • Wambaugh JF; Spanish National Environmental Health Centre, Instituto de Salud Carlos III. Madrid, Spain.
  • Yang JY; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, RTP, NC, USA.
  • Yu C; Toxicology Research Division, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.
  • Fitzpatrick S; Toxicology Research Division, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.
ALTEX ; 41(3): 402-424, 2024.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38898799
ABSTRACT
The webinar series and workshop titled "Trust Your Gut Establishing Confidence in Gastrointestinal Models ­ An Overview of the State of the Science and Contexts of Use" was co-organized by NICEATM, NIEHS, FDA, EPA, CPSC, DoD, and the Johns Hopkins Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT) and hosted at the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, MD, USA on October 11-12, 2023. New approach methods (NAMs) for assessing issues of gastrointestinal tract (GIT)- related toxicity offer promise in addressing some of the limitations associated with animal-based assessments. GIT NAMs vary in complexity, from two-dimensional monolayer cell line-based systems to sophisticated 3-dimensional organoid systems derived from human primary cells. Despite advances in GIT NAMs, challenges remain in fully replicating the complex interactions and pro­cesses occurring within the human GIT. Presentations and discussions addressed regulatory needs, challenges, and innovations in incorporating NAMs into risk assessment frameworks; explored the state of the science in using NAMs for evaluating systemic toxicity, understanding absorption and pharmacokinetics, evaluating GIT toxicity, and assessing potential allergenicity; and discussed strengths, limitations, and data gaps of GIT NAMs as well as steps needed to establish confidence in these models for use in the regulatory setting.
Non-animal methods to assess whether chemicals may be toxic to the human digestive tract promise to complement or improve on animal-based methods. These approaches, which are based on human or animal cells and/or computer models, are faced with their own technical challenges and need to be shown to predict adverse effects in humans. Regulators are tasked with evaluating submitted data to best protect human health and the environment. A webinar series and workshop brought together scientists from academia, industry, military, and regulatory authorities from dif­ferent countries to discuss how non-animal methods can be integrated into the risk assessment of drugs, food additives, dietary supplements, pesticides, and industrial chemicals for gastrointestinal toxicity.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Gastrointestinal Tract / Animal Testing Alternatives Limits: Animals / Humans Language: En Journal: ALTEX Journal subject: MEDICINA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Gastrointestinal Tract / Animal Testing Alternatives Limits: Animals / Humans Language: En Journal: ALTEX Journal subject: MEDICINA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos