Comparing endoscopic and conventional surgery techniques for carpal tunnel syndrome: A retrospective study.
JPRAS Open
; 41: 80-87, 2024 Sep.
Article
in En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-38911671
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) versus open carpal tunnel release (OCTR) in treating carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), focusing on symptom relief, functional recovery and post-operative complications.Methods:
A retrospective analysis was conducted on 44 patients diagnosed with CTS, randomly assigned to undergo either ECTR (n=23) or OCTR (n=21). Parameters evaluated included post-operative pain, grip strength, functional status using the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score and time to return to work.Results:
Patients who underwent ECTR demonstrated superior functional recovery and quicker return to daily and work activities compared to those in the OCTR group. Grip strength improvement post-surgery showed no significant difference between the groups. However, ECTR patients reported significantly lower DASH scores and faster return to work, indicating better outcomes. There were fewer reports of post-operative complications and scar sensitivity in the ECTR group.Conclusion:
ECTR provides an effective alternative to OCTR for CTS treatment, with advantages in functional recovery speed, reduced post-operative discomfort and faster return to work. These findings support the adoption of ECTR as a preferred surgical approach for CTS, highlighting its potential to improve patient outcomes with minimal complications.
Full text:
1
Collection:
01-internacional
Database:
MEDLINE
Language:
En
Journal:
JPRAS Open
Year:
2024
Document type:
Article
Affiliation country:
Italia