Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
HLA-C mismatching improves outcomes following lung transplantation.
Hiho, Steven J; Levvey, Bronwyn J; Diviney, Mary B; Brooks, Andrew G; Holdsworth, Rhonda; Snell, Gregory I; Westall, Glen P; Sullivan, Lucy C.
Affiliation
  • Hiho SJ; Lung Transplant Service, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Levvey BJ; Australian Red Cross LifeBlood, Victorian Transplantation and Immunogenetics Service, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Diviney MB; Lung Transplant Service, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Brooks AG; Australian Red Cross LifeBlood, Victorian Transplantation and Immunogenetics Service, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Holdsworth R; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Snell GI; Australian Red Cross LifeBlood, Victorian Transplantation and Immunogenetics Service, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Westall GP; Lung Transplant Service, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Sullivan LC; Lung Transplant Service, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
HLA ; 103(6): e15544, 2024 Jun.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38924641
ABSTRACT
HLA (HLA) are a major barrier to transplant success, as HLA-A and -B molecules are principal ligands for T-cells, and HLA-C for Killer cell Immunoglobulin-like Receptors (KIR), directing Natural Killer (NK) cell function. HLA-C molecules are designated "C1" or "C2" ligands based on residues 77 and 80, which determine the NK cell responses. Here, we investigated donor/recipient HLA-C mismatch associations with the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) following lung transplantation (LTx). 310 LTx donor/recipient pairs were Next Generation Sequenced and assessed for C1 and C2 allotypes. PIRCHE scores were used to quantify HLA mismatching between donor/recipients at amino acid level and stratify recipients into low, moderate or highly mismatched groups (n = 103-104). Associations between C ligands and freedom from CLAD was assessed with Cox regression models and survival curves. C2/C2 recipients (n = 42) had less CLAD than those with C1/C1 (n = 138) or C1/C2 genotypes (n = 130) (p < 0.05). Incidence of CLAD was lower in C2/C2 recipients receiving a mismatched C1/C1 allograft (n = 14), compared to matched (n = 8) or heterozygous (n = 20) allografts. Furthermore, ~80% of these recipients (C2/C2 recipients receiving C1/C1 transplants) remained CLAD-free for 10 years post-LTx. Recipients with higher HLA-C mismatching had less CLAD (p < 0.05) an observation not explained by linkage disequilibrium with other HLA loci. Our data implicates a role for HLA-C in CLAD development. HLA-C mismatching was not detrimental to LTx outcome, but potentially beneficial, representing a paradigm shift in assessing donor/recipient matching. This may inform better selection of donor/recipient pairs and potentially more targeted approaches to treating CLAD.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Histocompatibility Testing / HLA-C Antigens / Lung Transplantation Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: HLA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Histocompatibility Testing / HLA-C Antigens / Lung Transplantation Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: HLA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia