Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of Multiantibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement on the Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infections of Hip and Knee Arthroplasties-A Single-Center Retrospective Study.
Blersch, Benedikt Paul; Sax, Florian Hubert; Mederake, Moritz; Benda, Sebastian; Schuster, Philipp; Fink, Bernd.
Affiliation
  • Blersch BP; Department of Joint Replacement, General and Rheumatic Orthopaedics, Orthopaedic Clinic Markgröningen gGmbH, Kurt-Lindemann-Weg 10, 71706 Markgröningen, Germany.
  • Sax FH; Department of Joint Replacement, General and Rheumatic Orthopaedics, Orthopaedic Clinic Markgröningen gGmbH, Kurt-Lindemann-Weg 10, 71706 Markgröningen, Germany.
  • Mederake M; Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Klinik, University of Tübingen, Schnarrenbergstraße 95, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
  • Benda S; Department of Trauma, Hand Surgery and Orthopedics, Clinic Konstanz, Mainaustraße 35, 78464 Konstanz, Germany.
  • Schuster P; Department of Joint Replacement, General and Rheumatic Orthopaedics, Orthopaedic Clinic Markgröningen gGmbH, Kurt-Lindemann-Weg 10, 71706 Markgröningen, Germany.
  • Fink B; Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Paracelsus Medical University, Prof. Ernst Nathan Straße 1, 90419 Nuremberg, Germany.
Antibiotics (Basel) ; 13(6)2024 Jun 03.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38927190
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Two-stage septic revision is the prevailing method for addressing late periprosthetic infections. Using at least dual-antibiotic-impregnated bone cement leads to synergistic effects with a more efficient elution of individual antibiotics. Recent data on the success rates of multiantibiotic cement spacers in two-stage revisions are rare.

METHODS:

We conducted a retrospective follow-up single-center study involving 250 patients with late periprosthetic hip infections and 95 patients with prosthetic knee infections who underwent septic two-stage prosthesis revision surgery between 2017 and 2021. In accordance with the antibiotic susceptibility profile of the microorganisms, a specific mixture of antibiotics within the cement spacer was used, complemented by systemic antibiotic treatment. All patients underwent preoperative assessments and subsequent evaluations at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months post operation and at the most recent follow-up.

RESULTS:

During the observation period, the survival rate after two-step septic revision was 90.7%. Although survival rates tended to be slightly lower for difficult-to-treat (DTT) microorganism, there was no difference between the pathogen groups (easy-to-treat (ETT) pathogens, methicillin-resistant staphylococci (MRS), and difficult-to-treat (DTT) pathogens). Furthermore, there were no differences between monomicrobial and polymicrobial infections. No difference in the survival rate was observed between patients with dual-antibiotic-loaded bone cement without an additional admixture (Copal® G+C and Copal® G+V) and patients with an additional admixture of antibiotics to proprietary cement.

CONCLUSION:

Employing multiple antibiotics within spacer cement, tailored to pathogen susceptibility, appears to provide reproducibly favorable success rates, even in instances of infections with DTT pathogens and polymicrobial infections.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Antibiotics (Basel) Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Alemania Country of publication: Suiza

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Antibiotics (Basel) Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Alemania Country of publication: Suiza