Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Shedding light on the non-operative treatment of the forgotten side of the knee: rehabilitation of medial collateral ligament injuries-a systematic review.
Svantesson, Jasmine; Piussi, Ramana; Weissglas, Elin; Svantesson, Eleonor; Horvath, Alexandra; Börjesson, Erik; Williams, Andy; Prill, Robert; Samuelsson, Kristian; Hamrin Senorski, Eric.
Affiliation
  • Svantesson J; Sportrehab, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Piussi R; Department of Health and Rehabilitation, University of Gothenburg, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Goteborg, Sweden.
  • Weissglas E; Sahlgrenska Sports Medicine Center, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Svantesson E; Sportrehab, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Horvath A; Sahlgrenska Sports Medicine Center, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Börjesson E; Department of Orthopedics, University of Gothenburg Sahlgrenska Academy, Goteborg, Sweden.
  • Williams A; Department of Orthopedics, University of Gothenburg Sahlgrenska Academy, Goteborg, Sweden.
  • Prill R; Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Samuelsson K; Sahlgrenska Sports Medicine Center, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Hamrin Senorski E; Department of Orthopedics, University of Gothenburg Sahlgrenska Academy, Goteborg, Sweden.
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med ; 10(2): e001750, 2024.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38933372
ABSTRACT

Objective:

The purpose of this study was to review the current literature regarding the non-operative treatment of isolated medial collateral ligament (MCL) injuries.

Design:

Systematic review, registered in the Open Science Framework (https//doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/E9CP4). Data sources The Embase, MEDLINE and PEDro databases were searched; last search was performed on December 2023. Eligibility criteria Peer-reviewed original reports from studies that included information about individuals who sustained an isolated MCL injury with non-surgical treatment as an intervention, or reports comparing surgical with non-surgical treatment were eligible for inclusion. Included reports were synthesised qualitatively. Risk of bias was assessed with the Risk of Bias Assessment tool for Non-randomized Studies. Certainty of evidence was determined using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation.

Results:

A total of 26 reports (1912 patients) were included, of which 18 were published before the year 2000 and 8 after. No differences in non-operative treatment were reported between grade I and II injuries, where immediate weight bearing and ambulation were tolerated, and rehabilitation comprised different types of strengthening exercises with poorly reported details. Some reports used immobilisation with a brace as a treatment method, while others did not use any equipment. The use of a brace and duration of use was inconsistently reported.

Conclusion:

There is substantial heterogeneity and lack of detail regarding the non-operative treatment of isolated MCL injuries. This should prompt researchers and clinicians to produce high-quality evidence studies on the promising non-operative treatment of isolated MCL injuries to aid in decision-making and guide rehabilitation after MCL injury. Level of evidence Level I, systematic review.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Suecia Country of publication: Reino Unido

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Suecia Country of publication: Reino Unido