A multi-center real-life prospective study of axicabtagene ciloleucel versus tisagenlecleucel toxicity and outcomes in Large B-Cell Lymphomas.

ABSTRACT

This real-world prospective observational study across 21 Italian centers (CART-SIE) compares axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) outcomes in 485 relapsed-refractory large B-cell lymphoma patients with baseline characteristics matched by Stabilized Inverse Propensity-Score Weighting. Axi-cel versus tisa-cel had higher all-grade cytokine release syndrome (78.6% vs 89.3%, p=0.0017) and neurotoxicity (9.9% vs 32.2%, p<0.0001), but also superior progression-free survival (PFS) at one year (46.5% vs 34.1%, p=0.0009). Even among patients who failed bridging therapy, axi-cel PFS was superior to tisa-cel (37.5% vs 22.7%, p=0.0059). Differences in overall survival (OS) and high-grade immune toxicities were not significant. The CAR-HEMATOTOX score not only predicted hematologic toxicity but also 1-year survival outcomes (51.5% in CAR-HEMATOTOX high vs. 77.2% in CAR-HEMATOTOX low, p<0.0001). Twenty patients developed second primary malignancies, including two cases of T-cell neoplasms. These findings enable more informed selection of anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy balancing bridging, safety and efficacy considerations for individual patients.