A comparison of techniques to determine active motor threshold for transcranial magnetic stimulation research.

ABSTRACT

The determination of active motor threshold (AMT) is a critical step in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) research. As AMT is frequently determined using an absolute electromyographic (EMG) threshold (e.g., 200 µV peak-to-peak amplitude), wide variation in EMG recordings across participants has given reason to consider relative thresholds (e.g., = 2 × background sEMG) for AMT determination. However, these approaches have not been systemically compared. Our purpose was to compare AMT estimations derived from absolute and relative criteria commonly used in the quadriceps, and assess the test-retest reliability of each approach. We used a repeated measures design to assess AMT estimations in the vastus lateralis (VL) from eighteen young adults (9 males and 9 females; mean ± SD age = 23 ± 2 years) across two laboratory visits. AMT was determined for each criterion, at each lab visit. A paired samples t-test was used to compare mean differences in AMT estimations during the second laboratory visit. Paired samples t-tests and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC2,1) were calculated to assess test-retest reliability of each criterion. Differences between the criteria were small and not statistically significant (p = 0.309). The absolute criterion demonstrated moderate to excellent reliability (ICC2,1 = 0.866 [0.648-0.950]), but higher AMTs were observed in the second visit (p = 0.043). The relative criteria demonstrated good-to-excellent test-retest reliability (ICC2,1 = 0.894 [0.746-0.959]) and AMTs were not different between visits (p = 0.420). TMS researchers aiming to track corticospinal characteristics across visits should consider implementing relative criterion approaches during their AMT determination protocol.