Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Delta check limits for thyroid function tests adjusted for clinical settings.
Shin, Sunghwan; Yu, Shinae; Cho, Eun-Jung; Shin, Kyung-Hwa; Chung, Jae-Woo; Kim, Sollip; Yoo, Soo Jin.
Affiliation
  • Shin S; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: shin727@gmail.com.
  • Yu S; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: tlsdo55@naver.com.
  • Cho EJ; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: ejlovi@naver.com.
  • Shin KH; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University and Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: skyoungh@naver.com.
  • Chung JW; Departments of Laboratory Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: beautor@naver.com.
  • Kim S; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: sollip_kim@amc.seoul.kr.
  • Yoo SJ; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: sjyoo@paik.ac.kr.
Clin Chim Acta ; 561: 119847, 2024 Jul 15.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38969088
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This study aimed to determine practical delta check limits (DCLs) for thyroid function tests (TFTs) to detect sample misidentifications across various clinical settings.

METHODS:

Between 2020 and 2022, 610,437 paired TFT results were collected from six university hospitals. The absolute DCL (absDCL) was determined using the 95th percentile for each clinical setting from a random 60 % of the total data. These absDCLs were then tested within and across different settings using the remaining 40 % of the data, alongside mix-up datasets for result and sample comparisons. The sensitivities of absDCL were calculated within and across groups in the mix-up datasets.

RESULTS:

Health screening absDCLs were notably lower than in other settings (2.58 vs. 5.93-7.08 for thyroid-stimulating hormone; 4.12 vs. 8.24-10.04 for free thyroxine; 0.49 vs. 0.82-0.91 for total triiodothyronine). The proportion of results exceeding absDCL of health screening differed from those of other clinical settings. Furthermore, sensitivity between health screening and other clinical settings was significantly different in both the result mix-up and sample mix-up datasets.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study determined practical DCLs for TFTs and highlighted differences in absDCLs between health screening and other settings. These findings emphasize the importance of tailored DCLs in improving the accurate reporting of TFTs.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Thyroid Function Tests Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Clin Chim Acta Year: 2024 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Thyroid Function Tests Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Clin Chim Acta Year: 2024 Document type: Article