Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
An In Vitro Study of Retention and Marginal Adaptation of Endocrowns With Different Intracoronal Depths.
Tiew, E C; Azis, Nmn; Teh, L A; Shukor, Sna; Goo, C L.
Affiliation
  • Tiew EC; Eng Cheong Tiew, BDS, MFDS, National University of Malaysia: Universiti Kebangsaan, Malaysia.
  • Azis N; Nik Madihah Nik Azis, BDS, DClinDent, National University of Malaysia: Universiti Kebangsaan, Malaysia.
  • Teh LA; Lay Ann Teh, MFD RCS, DClinDent, M Endo RCS, National University of Malaysia: Universiti Kebangsaan, Malaysia.
  • Shukor S; *Siti Nuramanina Abdul Shukor, BDS, MFDSRCS, DClinDent, National University of Malaysia: Universiti Kebangsaan, Malaysia.
  • Goo CL; Chui Ling Goo, DDS, MDS, MFD RCS, M Pros RCS, National University of Malaysia: Universiti Kebangsaan, Malaysia.
Oper Dent ; 49(4): 403-411, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38978316
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Marginal adaptation and retention of endocrowns are crucial for the success and survival of endocrowns. This study aimed to investigate the effect of different materials and intracoronal depth on the retention and marginal adaptation of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic endocrowns.

METHODS:

Thirty-six mandibular premolar teeth with an average surface area of 64.49 mm2 were prepared to receive CAM/CAM fabricated endocrowns. Samples were divided randomly and equally into groups of lithium disilicate with 2 mm intracoronal depth (LD2), lithium disilicate with 4 mm intracoronal depth (LD4), polymer infiltrated ceramic network with 2 mm intracoronal depth (PICN2) and polymer infiltrated ceramic network with 4 mm intracoronal depth (PICN4). All endocrowns were cemented using ParaCore resin cement with 14N pressure and cured for 20 seconds. Fifty measurements of absolute marginal discrepancy (AMD) were done using a stereomicroscope after cementation. After 24 hours, all samples were subjected to thermocycling before the retention test. This involved using a universal testing machine with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min and applying a load of 500N. The maximum force to detach the crown was recorded in newtons and the mode of failure was identified.

RESULTS:

Two-way ANOVA revealed that the AMD for PICN was statistically significantly better than lithium disilicate (p=0.01). No statistically significant difference was detected in the AMD between the two intracoronal depths (p=0.72). PICN and endocrowns with 4 mm intracoronal depth had statistically significant better retention (p<0.05). 72.22% of the sample suffered from cohesive failures and 10 LD endocrowns suffered adhesive failures.

CONCLUSIONS:

Within the limitations of this study, we found that different materials and intracoronal depths can indeed influence the retention of CAD/CAM fabricated endocrowns. Based on the controlled setting findings, PICN was found to have better retention and better marginal adaptation than similar lithium disilicate premolar endocrowns.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Computer-Aided Design / Dental Marginal Adaptation / Crowns Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Oper Dent Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Malasia

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Computer-Aided Design / Dental Marginal Adaptation / Crowns Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Oper Dent Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Malasia