Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Outcomes after precision prostatectomy: safety, efficacy and transference of skills.
Kolanukuduru, Kaushik P; Busby, Dallin; Grauer, Ralph; Choudhary, Manish K; Mandel, Asher; Maheshwari, Ashutosh; Tewari, Ash K; Menon, Mani.
Affiliation
  • Kolanukuduru KP; Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. kaushik.kolanukuduru@mountsinai.org.
  • Busby D; Department of Urology, The University of Texas Health Science Centre at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
  • Grauer R; Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
  • Choudhary MK; Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
  • Mandel A; Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
  • Maheshwari A; Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
  • Tewari AK; Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
  • Menon M; Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
World J Urol ; 42(1): 394, 2024 Jul 10.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38985306
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Precision Prostatectomy (PP) is a viable treatment option for men with unilateral dominant cancer who are interested in preserving functional outcomes. To date, the data published about the outcomes of this technique has come from a single center only (Henry Ford - HF). We present the surgical, functional, and oncological outcomes of the first series of patients to undergo PP outside of HF, to demonstrate the safety and reproducibility of the technique.

METHODS:

Between 2022 and 2023, PP was offered to select patients who were interested in preserving their functional status. Men who underwent PP were followed at 3 monthly intervals; information regarding their functional status was simultaneously obtained. Men who had biochemical recurrence were advised to undergo remnant biopsy. If residual cancer was detected, then remnant removal was performed.

RESULTS:

The median age and median PSA of the study group was 63 years and 6.89 ng/ml respectively. The median operative and console times were 196.5 and 154 minutes. No intra-operative complications were noted. Three patients had a total of three post-operative complications. Three patients had biochemical recurrence; cancer was not detected in any of these patients on postoperative biopsies of the prostatic remnant. At 12 months, 91% of patients reported using 0 pads/day and 90.9% of pre-operatively potent patients were potent at 12 months.

CONCLUSION:

PP is a safe and reproducible technique that can ensure cancer control and preservation of functional status in select patients. Further studies with large sample sizes and longer follow-up are required to ascertain the long-term outcomes of this surgical technique.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prostatectomy / Prostatic Neoplasms Limits: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: World J Urol Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos Country of publication: Alemania

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prostatectomy / Prostatic Neoplasms Limits: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: World J Urol Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos Country of publication: Alemania